Within Sardinia UFOs
Why So Many Sardinian UFO Cases Stay Unresolved
Most Sardinian cases remain unresolved because timings, original testimony, photographs, radar data and weather records are incomplete or unavailable.
On this page
- The records needed for reliable reconstruction
- How retellings change witness claims
- The difference between unexplained and extraordinary
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Most Sardinian UFO cases stay unresolved for a simple reason: investigators do not receive enough reliable information to reconstruct what happened. A witness may report an unusual light, shape or movement, yet omit the exact time, viewing direction, duration or location. Photographs may lack original files and metadata. Radar, flight and weather records may never be requested, may not be publicly available or may be impossible to match because the reported time is only approximate.
In this setting, “unresolved” does not mean that an exotic craft has survived every scientific test. It usually means that several ordinary explanations remain possible but none can be demonstrated conclusively. Sardinia makes this problem particularly visible because its skies include civil and military aircraft, helicopters, satellites, drones, meteors and observations made over dark countryside or open sea. The mystery often lies less in the object than in the missing evidence needed to identify it.
The records needed for a reliable reconstruction
A useful investigation begins by fixing the basic geometry of the sighting. Investigators need the observer’s exact position, the start and end times, the direction and height of the object above the horizon, its apparent size, its path across the sky and the viewing conditions. Without those details, it may be impossible to test whether the witness saw an aircraft approaching head-on, a bright astronomical object, a satellite reflection, a balloon or a light viewed through haze.
The Italian Air Force reporting form reflects these requirements. It asks witnesses for the date and local time, meteorological conditions, location, viewing method, duration, initial and final positions, height above the horizon, apparent motion, brightness and sound. It also asks for sketches and permits supporting photographs or films to be attached. Witnesses are told to record only details they remember with certainty.[Aeronautica Militare]aeronautica.difesa.itAeronautica Militare
These questions are not administrative decoration. Each supplies a test that may separate competing explanations:
- An exact time permits comparison with aircraft movements, satellite passes, rocket launches and astronomical positions.
- A precise direction and elevation show whether a planet, star or approaching aircraft occupied the same part of the sky.
- Weather information helps assess cloud illumination, haze, atmospheric distortion and windborne objects.
- Original photographs or video may preserve timestamps, exposure settings, frame sequences and fixed landmarks.
- Independent records such as radar, air-traffic data or several separated witnesses can establish whether the reported motion was physical rather than an effect of perspective.
Modern technical research reaches the same conclusion. Serious aerial-anomaly studies increasingly call for several instruments operating together: wide- and narrow-field cameras, range or radar measurements, radio receivers, microphones and environmental sensors. The purpose is to measure distance, speed and physical properties rather than infer them from a single image or verbal description.[arXiv]arxiv.orgThe Scientific Investigation of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) Using Multimodal Ground-Based ObservatoriesMay 29, 2023…
Most historical Sardinian reports do not meet that standard. They began as brief observations and survived through newspaper summaries, local recollections or civilian files. By the time somebody attempts a detailed review, the original image may be unavailable, the witnesses may be difficult to locate and the operational records needed for comparison may never have been preserved with the case.
Elmas shows how a strong story can remain a weak file
The 27 October 1977 sighting at Cagliari-Elmas Airport illustrates the difference between an intriguing event and a reconstructable one. A later local account says that several people near the flying club saw an orange, elliptical object pass close to two helicopters and that the pilots later described an unusual encounter. The episode reportedly attracted considerable newspaper attention.[Ainnantis]ainnantis.orgsa matessi die 27 ottobreSA MATESSI DIE – 27 ottobre 1977…
The location appears promising. An airport may provide aviation professionals, known traffic routes and access to air-traffic or operational documentation. Multiple witnesses and nearby helicopters could, in principle, allow investigators to compare viewing angles and establish whether everyone observed the same object.
Yet the commonly accessible retelling does not supply the underlying material required for that exercise. It does not reproduce complete, separately recorded first statements from the witnesses and pilots. It provides no radar plot, radio transcript, flight log, precise second-by-second chronology, original map of the observers’ positions or documented weather reconstruction. Even the assertion that the object passed “near” the helicopters is difficult to evaluate without knowing how distance was estimated.
This leaves several interpretations open. The observers may have seen something genuinely unusual. They may also have misjudged the distance or outline of an aircraft or helicopter light against a poorly defined background. A luminous object apparently beside an aircraft may actually be much nearer or farther away, because a night sky supplies few depth cues. Without the original evidence, neither the extraordinary interpretation nor a conventional identification can be proved.
The Elmas case therefore stays unresolved through evidential attrition. Its memorable features survive—airport, pilots, orange ellipse, helicopters—but the measurements needed to test those features do not. Repetition makes the story more familiar, not necessarily more verifiable.
Recent clusters reveal the same bottleneck
The reporting wave in southern Sardinia during February and March 2022 shows that the problem is not confined to old newspaper stories. Civilian investigators collected accounts from Monastir, Assemini, San Sperate, Cagliari, Uta and nearby places. Witnesses described luminous rings, spheres, cigar-like forms, intermittent lights and objects apparently associated with helicopters. Some supplied photographs or video.[CISU]cisu.orgOndata di avvistamenti sulla SardegnaOndata di avvistamenti sulla Sardegna - CISU - Centro Italiano Studi Ufologici…
The cases contained potentially useful overlaps. Several reports came from the same broad area, some pointed towards Elmas or Decimomannu, and more than one involved greenish circular lighting or helicopter noise. A cluster can be more informative than an isolated sighting because investigators can compare times, routes and descriptions.
However, the investigators themselves cautioned that they did not yet possess all the details. They noted that some reports might relate to helicopters operating near military air routes and specifically considered the appearance of an NH90 helicopter as a possible explanation. The similarity between accounts therefore did not establish a fleet of unknown objects; it created a hypothesis that still required fuller timing, positional and aviation data.[CISU]cisu.orgOndata di avvistamenti sulla SardegnaOndata di avvistamenti sulla Sardegna - CISU - Centro Italiano Studi Ufologici…
Local reporting from the same period provides a useful contrast. A triangular luminous object reported to the planetarium was photographed after observers were advised to obtain an image, allowing it to be classified as a drone. Other reports remained unexplained at the time.[L'Unione Sarda.it]unionesarda.itL'Unione Sarda.itSightings of unidentified flying objects: reports from southern Sardinia - L'Unione Sarda English…
That contrast shows how cases move into different categories. One report acquired a diagnostic image and became identified. Others lacked the information needed to reach the same endpoint. Their unresolved status did not make them stronger than the drone case; it meant that the decisive evidence was absent.
How retellings change witness claims
A UFO report passes through several stages: perception, memory, verbal account, written report and later retelling. At every stage, information can be lost or altered. The Italian Centre for UFO Studies describes this as an “information chain”. The original stimulus is no longer available to the investigator, who must work backwards from a report produced after the event. Its methodology manual warns that physical, psychological and social influences can significantly alter a case as it travels through that chain.[CISU]cisu.orgManuale di metodologia CISU 2010XP¥ - Manuale UFO ¥ Ed. prv…
The first difficulty occurs during the sighting itself. Distance, haze, darkness, reflections through glass, viewing angle and duration can change how an ordinary stimulus appears. A point of light has no visible structure from which its true size or distance can be judged. Once a witness assumes that it is nearby, rapid angular movement may be remembered as extreme physical speed.
The second difficulty is language. Witnesses have to translate a brief visual experience into familiar descriptions such as “disc”, “cigar”, “sphere”, “window” or “formation”. These words may be useful, but they can imply more structure than was actually visible. A row of lights may become a solid triangular craft; a bright central light with coloured lights at the sides may become a rectangular object.
The third difficulty is contamination after the event. Witnesses may talk to one another, read news coverage, view illustrations or answer leading questions before their first detailed interview. Research on eyewitness memory finds that the first uncontaminated account is especially important. Later questioning and repeated recall can strengthen confidence in a version of events even when some details were introduced or reshaped after the observation.[Sage Journals]journals.sagepub.comSage Journals Rethinking the Reliability of Eyewitness MemorySage JournalsRethinking the Reliability of Eyewitness Memory - John T. Wixted, Laura Mickes, Ronald P. Fisher, 2018…
This does not mean witnesses are dishonest or that all testimony is worthless. A prompt, independently recorded and confidence-rated account can be valuable. The problem arises when the earliest description is missing and only a polished version survives years later. Investigators can no longer tell which details belonged to the original observation and which emerged through discussion, interpretation or publication.
Photographs often preserve ambiguity rather than solve it
A photograph seems more objective than testimony, but many UFO images are poor measuring devices. Mobile-phone cameras enlarge small bright objects, blur movement, introduce digital sharpening and adjust exposure automatically. A light photographed against an empty night sky may have no horizon, building or landscape feature from which to calculate direction, scale or motion.
The original file matters. A screenshot, compressed social-media copy or cropped image may have lost its timestamp and technical metadata. If investigators do not know the exact camera position and orientation, they cannot reliably compare the image with aircraft, satellite or astronomical data. A single frame may also record a bird, insect, lens reflection or aircraft in a form that looks unlike the object when viewed continuously.
Video can be more useful because it records movement relative to fixed surroundings, but only when the surroundings remain visible and the file is available in its original form. Even then, apparent acceleration may be caused by camera movement, autofocus or digital stabilisation. The evidential value comes from reconstructable geometry, not merely from the presence of an unusual shape in the frame.
The 2022 Sardinian reports demonstrate both possibilities. Investigators received some images and video, yet still said that incomplete details prevented confident explanations in several cases. In the separate planetarium report, obtaining a suitable photograph was enough to recognise a drone.[CISU]cisu.orgOndata di avvistamenti sulla SardegnaOndata di avvistamenti sulla Sardegna - CISU - Centro Italiano Studi Ufologici…
Military connections raise interest but not proof
Sardinian reports are often considered more significant when they occur near Elmas, Decimomannu or military flying routes. That interest is understandable. Military aircraft can provide trained witnesses, radar coverage and operational records. They can also perform manoeuvres or use lighting systems unfamiliar to the public.
But proximity to military activity cuts both ways. It may increase the chance that a report concerns something operationally important, while also increasing the number of conventional but unfamiliar objects in the sky. Helicopters seen obliquely, formation flights, flares, training activity and distant aircraft lights can all produce unusual impressions.
A military connection becomes strong evidence only when it produces independent documentation: identified crews, precise flight tracks, original radar data, radio communications or sensor records that can be matched to witness accounts. A report merely stating that an object was “heading towards a base” or “followed by helicopters” remains interpretive unless the relative positions and timings are established.
Italy’s official process is narrower than many popular accounts imply. The Air Force collects and checks reports and classifies an episode as unidentified when it cannot find a technical or natural explanation. That classification records the outcome of the available investigation; it does not certify extraterrestrial origin.[Aeronautica Militare]aeronautica.difesa.itAeronautica Militare OVNIpuò farlo utilizzando la presente modulistica. Dopo averla compilata, dovrà consegnarla alla…
Official totals also reflect reporting rather than a complete census of everything seen over the island. An Air Force table for 1991–2000 records only three Sardinian reports in that decade, out of 112 nationally. That low figure could indicate few notable observations, limited reporting, strict inclusion criteria or some combination of all three. It cannot tell us how many unexplained objects were physically present.[Aeronautica Militare]aeronautica.difesa.itAeronautica Militare Presentazione standard di Power PointAeronautica Militare Presentazione standard di Power Point
Unresolved, weak and debunked are different outcomes
Public discussion often treats cases as either explained or extraordinary. In practice, investigators need at least three categories.
Identified or plausibly explained cases have enough matching evidence to support a conventional source. The 2022 triangular light recognised as a drone belongs in this group. A perfect reconstruction is not always necessary if the photograph, behaviour and circumstances clearly converge on one explanation.[L'Unione Sarda.it]unionesarda.itL'Unione Sarda.itSightings of unidentified flying objects: reports from southern Sardinia - L'Unione Sarda English…
Weak or insufficient cases lack enough reliable data for meaningful testing. They may contain only a second-hand story, an undated photograph, a vague direction or an account reported long after the event. Calling such a case unresolved is technically possible, but “insufficient information” communicates its evidential value more accurately.
Genuinely unexplained cases retain good-quality, internally consistent information after reasonable conventional explanations have been tested. Even here, unexplained means that the cause has not been established. It does not by itself identify the phenomenon as advanced technology, an extraterrestrial craft or anything else extraordinary.
This distinction prevents an important error: allowing the poorest records to appear the most mysterious. A case can resist explanation precisely because it is too incomplete to investigate. Missing data do not count as evidence for an exotic answer.
What would stop future cases becoming unresolved?
The most effective intervention is rapid, standardised documentation. Sardinian witnesses who report an unusual aerial event can preserve much more value by recording the exact time immediately, saving the original photograph or video, marking their position and viewing direction on a map, and writing an account before discussing it extensively with others.
Investigators should obtain separate first accounts from each witness, distinguish certainty from estimation and avoid questions that suggest a shape or explanation. Aircraft movements, satellite trajectories, astronomical positions and weather conditions should be checked while precise data remain available. Where military or airport activity is relevant, requests for corroborating records need to be made early rather than decades later.
The Air Force form and the civilian investigation manual already contain much of this logic. Both emphasise time, location, weather, viewing geometry, sketches and careful handling of memory.[CISU]cisu.orgManuale di metodologia CISU 2010XP¥ - Manuale UFO ¥ Ed. prv… The recurring weakness is not the absence of a method, but the fact that many sightings enter the record too late or with too little detail for that method to work.
The difference between unexplained and extraordinary
Sardinia’s unresolved UFO cases matter because they show how uncertainty is produced. A striking observation may be sincere, widely reported and located near an airport or military route, yet still fail to answer the central questions: where was the object, how far away was it, what was moving, and what independent record confirms the account?
The responsible conclusion is neither automatic dismissal nor automatic belief. Cases such as Elmas deserve archival attention because original pilot statements, contemporary press reports or operational documents could materially change their assessment. Recent clusters deserve careful comparison because shared timings and routes may reveal a common source. But until those records exist, the unresolved label describes a limit of knowledge.
That is the central lesson of Sardinian UFO history: an event can remain unidentified without becoming evidence of something extraordinary. The gap between those two claims is filled—or left empty—by timing, geometry, original testimony, photographs, weather data, flight records and independent sensors.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Why So Many Sardinian UFO Cases Stay Unresolved. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Handbook: A Guide to Investigating, Evaluating, and R...
An explanation of the usual reasons for confusing IFOs (identified flying objects) with UFOs and a survey of the tools used to investigat...
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
Cited by the New York Review of Books as "the best brief for visitation," this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...
The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • From the renowned astronomer and author of Cosmos comes a “powerful [and] stirring defense of informed ration...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Current eBay listing
I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print
Current eBay listing
VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT
Endnotes
1.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: Aeronautica Militare
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/ModuloUFO.pdf
2.
Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18566
Source snippet
The Scientific Investigation of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) Using Multimodal Ground-Based ObservatoriesMay 29, 2023...
Published: May 29, 2023
3.
Source: ainnantis.org
Title: sa matessi die 27 ottobre 1977 2
Link:https://www.ainnantis.org/2023/10/27/sa-matessi-die-27-ottobre-1977-2/
Source snippet
SA MATESSI DIE – 27 ottobre 1977...
4.
Source: cisu.org
Title: Ondata di avvistamenti sulla Sardegna
Link:https://www.cisu.org/ondata-di-avvistamenti-sulla-sardegna/
Source snippet
Ondata di avvistamenti sulla Sardegna - CISU - Centro Italiano Studi Ufologici...
5.
Source: cisu.org
Title: Manuale di metodologia CISU 2010
Link:https://www.cisu.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Manuale_di_metodologia_CISU_2010.pdf
Source snippet
XP¥ - Manuale UFO ¥ Ed. prv...
6.
Source: cisu.org
Title: Geo-localizzazione degli avvistamenti: l’esempio della Puglia
Link:https://www.cisu.org/geo-localizzazione-degli-avvistamenti-lesempio-della-puglia/
Published: February 8, 2026
7.
Source: cisu.org
Title: UF O in Puglia: geolocalizzazione degli avvistamenti
Link:https://www.cisu.org/ufo-in-puglia-geolocalizzazione-degli-avvistamenti/
Published: January 28, 2026
8.
Source: cisu.org
Link:https://www.cisu.org/page/2/
Published: December 24, 2025
9.
Source: cisu.org
Title: Cat: il catalogo di segnalazioni italiane di avvistamenti UFO
Link:https://www.cisu.org/cisucat2/
Published: November 8, 2025
10.
Source: cisu.org
Title: Rilevamento radar conferma avvistamento UFO in Germania
Link:https://www.cisu.org/rilevamento-radar-conferma-avvistamento-ufo-in-germania/
Published: February 28, 2025
11.
Source: cisu.org
Title: 50 anni di UFO e ufologia ad Alessandria
Link:https://www.cisu.org/50-anni-di-ufo-e-ufologia-ad-alessandria/
Published: January 22, 2024
12.
Source: cisu.org
Title: Compie 50 anni il più famoso caso radar-visuale italiano
Link:https://www.cisu.org/compie-50-anni-il-piu-famoso-caso-radar-visuale-italiano/
Published: November 30, 2023
13.
Source: cisu.org
Title: caselle 1973
Link:https://www.cisu.org/caselle-1973/
Published: November 29, 2023
14.
Source: cisu.org
Title: Confermata da CUN e A.M. la diminuzione di avvistamenti
Link:https://www.cisu.org/confermata-da-cun-e-a-m-la-diminuzione-di-avvistamenti/
Published: January 21, 2018
15.
Source: cisu.org
Title: Raccogliere dati oggettivi nelle indagini UFO: le dimensioni angolari
Link:https://www.cisu.org/raccogliere-dati-oggettivi-nelle-indagini-ufo-le-dimensioni-angolari/
Published: November 28, 2017
16.
Source: cisu.org
Title: avvistamenti esteri estate 1971 un gruppo di ufo sui radar inglesi
Link:https://www.cisu.org/avvistamenti-esteri-estate-1971-un-gruppo-di-ufo-sui-radar-inglesi/
Published: November 25, 2016
17.
Source: cisu.org
Link:https://www.cisu.org/contatti/
Published: May 20, 2016
18.
Source: cisu.org
Title: Ufo e ufologia
Link:https://www.cisu.org/ufologia/
Published: May 20, 2016
19.
Source: cisu.org
Title: Chi siamo
Link:https://www.cisu.org/chi-siamo/
Published: May 20, 2016
20.
Source: cisu.org
Link:https://www.cisu.org/
21.
Source: cisu.org
Title: admin, Autore presso CISU
Link:https://www.cisu.org/author/admin/
22.
Source: cisu.org
Title: flap Archivi
Link:https://www.cisu.org/tag/flap/
23.
Source: cisu.org
Title: Avvistamenti UFO in Italia Archivi
Link:https://www.cisu.org/tag/avvistamenti-ufo-in-italia/
24.
Source: cisu.org
Title: Francisco Guerreiro Archivi
Link:https://www.cisu.org/tag/francisco-guerreiro/
25.
Source: cisu.org
Link:https://www.cisu.org/page/4/
26.
Source: cisu.org
Title: lanno ufologico 2024 secondo il cufos
Link:https://www.cisu.org/lanno-ufologico-2024-secondo-il-cufos/
27.
Source: unionesarda.it
Link:https://www.unionesarda.it/en/sardinia/sightings-of-unidentified-flying-objects-reports-from-southern-sardinia-pnh1ubdm
Source snippet
L'Unione Sarda.itSightings of unidentified flying objects: reports from southern Sardinia - L'Unione Sarda English...
28.
Source: journals.sagepub.com
Title: Sage Journals Rethinking the Reliability of Eyewitness Memory
Link:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1745691617734878
Source snippet
Sage JournalsRethinking the Reliability of Eyewitness Memory - John T. Wixted, Laura Mickes, Ronald P. Fisher, 2018...
29.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: Aeronautica Militare OVNI
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/ovni/
Source snippet
può farlo utilizzando la presente modulistica. Dopo averla compilata, dovrà consegnarla alla...
30.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: Aeronautica Militare Presentazione standard di Power Point
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/INT.Dperiodo1991-2000.pdf
31.
Source: unionesarda.it
Title: Trail of lights in the Sardinian sky: they are the Starlink satellites
Link:https://www.unionesarda.it/en/sardinia/starlink-satellites-furrow-the-sardinian-sky-o1kxc2nu/
Published: February 12, 2023
32.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it OVN I
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/en/2023/01/12/ovni/
Published: January 12, 2023
33.
Source: unionesarda.it
Title: nel 2021 avvistati due ufo nei cieli della sardegna mi5frdra
Link:https://www.unionesarda.it/news-sardegna/nel-2021-avvistati-due-ufo-nei-cieli-della-sardegna-mi5frdra?amp=1
Published: January 12, 2022
34.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/news/nato-air-policing-estonia-eurofighter-intercettano-velivolo-non-identificato/
Published: October 13, 2021
35.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/news/nato-air-policing-estonia-gli-f35-italiani-intercettano-velivoli-non-identificati/
Published: June 16, 2021
36.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/2021/05/20/ugcra-21-2021-2/
Published: May 20, 2021
37.
Source: unionesarda.it
Title: Puntini luminosi avvistati nei cieli sardi: ecco di cosa si tratta
Link:https://www.unionesarda.it/multimedia/puntini-luminosi-avvistati-nei-cieli-sardi-ecco-di-cosa-si-tratta-wqqlk7fz
Published: May 8, 2021
38.
Source: journals.sagepub.com
Link:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1745691617734878
Published: May 2, 2018
39.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it OVN I
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/en/ovni/
40.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it Ufficio relazioni con il pubblico
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/ufficio-relazioni-con-il-pubblico/
41.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it Redazione Aeronautica Militare, Author at Aeronautica Militare
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/author/redazione-aeronautica-militare/page/2/
42.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it Lo SMA
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/home/noi-siamo-l-am/organizzazione/lo-sma/
43.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it Redazione Aeronautica Militare, Author at Aeronautica Militare
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/en/author/redazione-aeronautica-militare/page/2/
44.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it OVN I Archives
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/category/ovni/
45.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it Archivi Notizie
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/news/page/256/
46.
Source: unionesarda.it
Link:https://www.unionesarda.it/en/sardinia/cagliari-report-of-ufo-hunters-quot-strange-flying-lights-at-the-port-channelquot-gtceyhtz
47.
Source: unionesarda.it
Link:https://www.unionesarda.it/tags/generici/ufo
Additional References
48.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: identifying ufos and uaps
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/skywatching/night-sky-network/identifying-ufos-and-uaps/
Published: December 1, 2013
49.
Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4335043/
Published: February 19, 2015
50.
Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10484215/
Published: August 24, 2023
51.
Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29716454/
52.
Source: cambridge.org
Link:https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/episteme/article/reevaluating-the-credibility-of-eyewitness-testimony-the-misinformation-effect-and-the-overcritical-juror/B8F651467F46D7D1BCA7F73D46C93FE4
Published: December 26, 2018
53.
Source: hq.eso.org
Link:https://www.hq.eso.org/public/news/eso2607/
Published: July 1, 2026
54.
Source: facebook.com
Title: did ufos took down an italian military helicopter
Link:https://www.facebook.com/SteveO/posts/did-ufos-took-down-an-italian-military-helicopter/622663792560720/
Published: March 1978
55.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/THEUFOFILESGROUP/posts/mediterranean-sea-off-the/2550705852033719/
Published: March 1978
56.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/gentileluca/videos/-oggetti-non-identificati-nei-cieli-della-sardegna-ne-avete-mai-visti%EF%B8%8F-sono-migl/1284781373854044/
57.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/Videolina/videos/ufo-o-droni-boom-di-avvistamenti-nei-cieli-dellisola-codice-arancione/377549221042494/?locale=ms_MY