Within Aosta Valley
How Strong Is the La Thuile UFO Photograph?
The 2013 photograph attracted attention, but without the original file or image sequence it cannot rule out ordinary airborne objects.
On this page
- What the witnesses reported
- What technical data is unavailable
- Bird, insect, balloon and aircraft possibilities
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The La Thuile photograph is probably Aosta Valley’s best-known modern UFO image, but it is not strong evidence of an extraordinary aircraft. A regional report says that a mother and daughter holidaying in La Thuile photographed a silent, unidentified object with an Apple iPhone on 12 July 2013. Beyond those basic details, however, the publicly available record is remarkably thin: no full witness statement, original image file, sequence of adjacent photographs, measured flight path or documented technical examination has surfaced in accessible reporting.[AostaCronaca]valledaostaglocal.itufo dal 1947 ad oggi circa 80 avvistamenti in valleAostaCronacaUFO: Dal 1947 ad oggi circa 80 avvistamenti in Valle - Valledaostaglocal.it…
That distinction matters. The photograph may record a real object, and the witnesses may have reported their experience accurately, yet a real object in a photograph is not necessarily a distant or unusual craft. With only one published image and little supporting data, a nearby bird or insect, a balloon, or a conventional aircraft seen under misleading conditions cannot be ruled out. The most defensible verdict is therefore unresolved because of insufficient information, not confirmed as exotic and not conclusively debunked.
What the witnesses reported
The surviving account is brief. It places the event at La Thuile on 12 July 2013 and describes the witnesses as a mother and daughter visiting Aosta Valley on holiday. According to the regional article published the following March, they used an Apple iPhone to photograph an object said to be flying and silent. The article reproduced the image as the latest entry in a wider chronology of reported sightings in the region.[AostaCronaca]valledaostaglocal.itufo dal 1947 ad oggi circa 80 avvistamenti in valleAostaCronacaUFO: Dal 1947 ad oggi circa 80 avvistamenti in Valle - Valledaostaglocal.it…
Those details give the case a human and geographical setting, but they do not answer the questions needed for a reliable reconstruction. The published account does not state:
- the precise time or location within La Thuile;
- which witness took the photograph;
- how long the object was visible;
- whether it hovered, travelled steadily or changed direction;
- whether it was noticed before the picture was taken or discovered afterwards;
- its apparent angular size;
- the direction in which the camera was facing;
- the weather, wind and visibility;
- whether other photographs were taken;
- whether anyone independent saw the same object.
The word “silent” sounds significant, but it is difficult to interpret without an estimated range. A nearby powered aircraft would normally be audible, whereas a distant aircraft may not be, particularly in wind, among mountains or when its apparent position does not match the direction from which its sound reaches the observer. A balloon, bird or insect would also produce no aircraft-like noise. Silence narrows possibilities only when distance and viewing conditions are known.
There is another ambiguity in the wording. The report calls the photographed object unidentified and silent, but it does not provide a verbatim witness interview or make clear whether both women watched it continuously with the naked eye. That matters because a puzzling shape noticed only after reviewing a photograph is a different evidential category from a structured object followed visually for several minutes.
What technical data is unavailable
The principal weakness is not simply that there is one photograph. It is that the photograph has not been made available with the supporting material needed to test what it represents.
The original file
A full-resolution original would normally contain Exchangeable Image File Format, or EXIF, metadata. Depending on the phone and its settings, this may include the date and time, camera model, focal length, exposure time, ISO sensitivity, image dimensions, orientation and sometimes location. These fields do not prove that an image is genuine, because metadata can be altered or stripped, but they help establish whether the file is consistent with the claimed device and circumstances.[Tower Forensics]towerforensics.co.ukwhat is exif data and how can digital forensics aid in image analysisTower ForensicsWhat is EXIF Data and How Can Digital Forensics Aid in…8 Jul 2024 — When a photo is taken, EXIF data is automatically e…
No publicly accessible original file or published EXIF examination appears in the surviving reporting found for the La Thuile case. Readers are generally encountering a web reproduction, not the best evidential version. Resizing and JPEG recompression can erase fine detail, alter edges and remove metadata. The European Network of Forensic Science Institutes warns that when an original and the source device are unavailable, proving originality is usually impossible; investigators may sometimes detect evidence of alteration, but absence of such evidence does not establish an untouched original.[ENFSI]enfsi.euBPM Image Authentication ENFSI BPM DIBPM Image Authentication ENFSI BPM DI
This means two separate questions remain unanswered:
- Was the displayed picture derived normally from an iPhone photograph?
- What physical object produced the shape in the picture?
Even a successful authenticity check would answer only the first. A photograph can be entirely genuine and still show a bird, balloon, aircraft, debris or photographic artefact.
Exposure and focus
Shutter speed, focus distance and digital zoom are especially important for a small airborne object. A fast-moving bird or insect can be stretched by motion blur. A nearby object outside the focus plane can become a smooth, apparently metallic or disc-like patch. Digital enlargement can then make a few indistinct pixels seem more structured than they are. Smartphone zoom often amounts largely to cropping rather than adding true optical detail, which magnifies pixelation as well as the subject.[Audubon]audubon.orgYour smartphone will let you home in on a bird, but it isn’t a true zoom—it just crops into the size of the original photo and leaves you…
Without the original resolution and camera settings, it is impossible to determine confidently whether the object’s outline represents its physical shape or a mixture of blur, defocus, sharpening and compression.
Distance and scale
A single picture of an object against the sky generally provides angular size — how large it appears in the frame — but not its true size. A small object close to the lens and a large object far away can occupy the same number of pixels. Researchers studying aerial anomalies describe this as a size–distance degeneracy: one cannot normally calculate real dimensions without an independent distance measurement, a reliable reference or observations from more than one position.[arXiv]arxiv.orgInitial Results From the First Field Expedition of UAPx to…A common error in UAP reports is size estimation from a single observa…
The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office similarly notes that featureless airborne objects are particularly difficult to size. Without recognisable wings, windows or another known feature, observers can unconsciously assign the object to the wrong distance and therefore infer the wrong dimensions.[AARO]aaro.milEffect of Forced Perspective and Parallax View on UAP ObservationsEffect of Forced Perspective and Parallax View on UAP Observations
Mountain scenery does not automatically solve this problem. Unless the image clearly shows that the object passes behind or in front of a known ridge, tree or building, the landscape supplies a background but not necessarily a usable range marker.
No sequence
Adjacent photographs or video frames would be much more informative than an isolated exposure. A sequence could reveal wingbeats, tumbling, gradual balloon drift, a recognisable aircraft profile or a consistent trajectory. It could also show whether the object appears in only one frame, a pattern often compatible with something small and close to the camera.
NASA’s independent UAP study identified lack of multiple measurements, sensor metadata and baseline information as recurring obstacles to reliable analysis. It stressed the value of calibrated, multi-sensor observations rather than isolated imagery collected without an investigative plan.[NASA Science]science.nasa.govOpen source on nasa.gov.
For La Thuile, there is no publicly documented second camera, radar return, flight record correlation or image sequence. The photograph therefore has little ability to establish speed, altitude, distance or manoeuvring behaviour.
Bird, insect, balloon and aircraft possibilities
None of the ordinary explanations can be proved from the available material. Equally, none can responsibly be excluded.
Bird. A bird seen from an unfamiliar angle can lose the familiar outline of wings and tail. During a wingbeat, banking turn or glide, its silhouette may appear oval, pointed or asymmetric. If the bird is small in the frame, compression and blur can remove feather detail. Technical work on automated bird detection notes that flying birds often have weak identifying features in individual frames and become easier to recognise when information from consecutive frames is combined.[arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv A Flying Bird Object Detection Method for Surveillance VideoarXiv A Flying Bird Object Detection Method for Surveillance Video
A bird hypothesis would become stronger if the object were sharply located against a distant background while its edges showed movement consistent with wings, or if neighbouring frames revealed a changing outline. No such sequence is publicly available.
Insect. A nearby insect can look surprisingly large because the photograph gives no direct measure of its distance. If it passes close to the phone, it may be badly out of focus and may acquire an elongated, saucer-like or translucent shape. Its rapid movement during the exposure can further distort its appearance. An insect is particularly difficult to reject when the object is present in only one exposure and has no stable surface detail.
The insect explanation is sometimes used too casually in UFO discussions, but here it remains a genuine possibility precisely because the original file, focus information and surrounding frames are absent. It is not a demonstrated solution; it is an untested ordinary candidate.
Balloon. A small party balloon, foil balloon or other wind-borne object may appear silent and can reflect sunlight unevenly, producing a bright or metallic-looking patch. Its shape can change as it rotates. Balloons are a recurrent resolution in modern official aerial-anomaly investigations, including cases that initially appeared unusual in military imagery.[AARO]aaro.milOfficial UAP ImageryOfficial UAP Imagery
Testing this possibility would require the observation time, wind direction, duration and motion. A balloon should generally drift with the local airflow, although mountain winds can vary significantly with altitude and terrain. The La Thuile account supplies none of the necessary trajectory data.
Aircraft. A conventional aeroplane or helicopter can look unlike itself when photographed head-on, tail-on, at distance or in blur. Wings may merge with the fuselage, and reflected sunlight can conceal normal structure. The report’s description of silence counts against a nearby low-flying aircraft, but not necessarily against one farther away. Without focal length, apparent size, bearing, duration and local traffic information, an aviation check cannot be completed.
Aircraft would become less plausible if witnesses had described prolonged hovering, abrupt acceleration or direction changes incompatible with normal flight. The accessible account does not report such behaviour.
Other mundane possibilities, such as wind-carried litter, a seed, a kite or a photographic artefact, also remain open. NASA’s public sky-identification guidance notes that balloons, aircraft and image artefacts regularly produce UFO reports, but identifying a particular case requires details specific to that event rather than a generic list of alternatives.[NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience Identifying UFOs and UAPsScience Identifying UFOs and UAPs
Was the photograph officially investigated?
The regional article discusses the Italian Air Force’s general procedure for reports of unidentified flying objects. It says detailed reports made through the Carabinieri could be passed to military authorities, who might check meteorological information, radar-tracked aircraft and known objects such as weather balloons. It also correctly explains that an official “unidentified” classification means no technical or natural explanation was established from the available information; it does not confirm an extraterrestrial vehicle.[AostaCronaca]valledaostaglocal.itufo dal 1947 ad oggi circa 80 avvistamenti in valleAostaCronacaUFO: Dal 1947 ad oggi circa 80 avvistamenti in Valle - Valledaostaglocal.it…
However, the article does not provide a La Thuile case number, an investigation report, the witnesses’ completed questionnaire, a radar check or a stated official conclusion for this photograph. Its discussion of the Air Force archive sits alongside the La Thuile story, but that is not the same as demonstrating that this particular image underwent a formal military investigation.
That distinction should be preserved. The photograph became part of a regional UFO retrospective, yet the public record does not show the chain of custody or analytical documentation expected of a robust official case. Later online repetition appears to derive mainly from the same short local account rather than from newly released technical findings.
How strong is the La Thuile photograph?
As an illustration of what the witnesses reported, the picture has some value. It anchors the event to a date and place and shows that an indistinct airborne shape was captured. There is no good basis for accusing the witnesses of fabrication merely because the object remains unidentified.
As proof of an unusual craft, however, it is weak. The case lacks nearly every feature that would allow a single photograph to carry substantial evidential weight:
- a full-resolution original with preserved metadata;
- a documented chain of custody;
- a detailed contemporary witness statement;
- multiple frames or video;
- a known scale or distance;
- independent witnesses;
- radar, aviation or meteorological correlation;
- a published forensic examination;
- a clearly anomalous movement or performance.
The absence of those elements does not prove that the object was ordinary. It prevents a reliable choice between ordinary and extraordinary interpretations. This is the central lesson of the La Thuile case: unidentified in one image is a statement about the limits of the record, not about the nature of the object.
Within Aosta Valley’s UFO history, the photograph matters because it is memorable, modern and visually reproducible. It is stronger as an example of how a local sighting enters public memory than as a technically persuasive anomaly. Unless the original iPhone file, additional images or a detailed investigation emerge, later reporting has neither decisively strengthened nor debunked the claim. It has left it in the broadest and least dramatic category: a genuine report attached to an image that does not contain enough information to identify what was photographed.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to How Strong Is the La Thuile UFO Photograph?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
Cited by the New York Review of Books as "the best brief for visitation," this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...
How UFOs Conquered the World: The History of a Modern Myth
"Cover[s] all the major themes of ufology, ranging from lights in the sky to crashed saucers, government cover-ups and alien abductions ....
UFOs Explained
Analyzing several UFO cases, the author exposes the myth of extraterrestrial visitors to earth.
Understanding Exposure
Rating: 4.5/5 from 19 Google Books ratings
Provides detailed lessons on the elements of exposure and how each relates to depth of field, freezing and blurring action, and shooting...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Current eBay listing
VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT
Current eBay listing
I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print
Endnotes
1.
Source: enfsi.eu
Title: BPM Image Authentication ENFSI BPM DI 003 1
Link:https://enfsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/BPM_Image-Authentication_ENFSI-BPM-DI-003-1.pdf
2.
Source: audubon.org
Link:https://www.audubon.org/magazine/may-june-2016/how-photograph-birds-smartphone
Source snippet
Your smartphone will let you home in on a bird, but it isn’t a true zoom—it just crops into the size of the original photo and leaves you...
3.
Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/html/2312.00558v4
Source snippet
Initial Results From the First Field Expedition of UAPx to...A common error in UAP reports is size estimation from a single observa...
4.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: Effect of Forced Perspective and Parallax View on UAP Observations
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/Information%20Papers/AARO_Effect_of_Forced_Perspective_and_Parallax_View_on_UAP_Observations_2024.pdf
5.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report.pdf
6.
Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv A Flying Bird Object Detection Method for Surveillance Video
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.03749
7.
Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.01917
8.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: Official UAP Imagery
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/
9.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/UAP-Reporting-Trends/
10.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: Science Identifying UFOs and UAPs
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/skywatching/night-sky-network/identifying-ufos-and-uaps/
11.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-Imagery-Acc-Table/
12.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/
13.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: AAR O UAP Case RR Data Table
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-UAP-Case-RR-Data-Table/
14.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: Scientific Balloons
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/scientificballoons/
15.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: Scientific Balloon FAQs
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/scientificballoons/faqs/
16.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: Types of Scientific Balloons
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/scientificballoons/types-of-balloons/
17.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: Scientific Balloons Overview
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/scientificballoons/overview/
18.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: Air Traffic Management
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/armd/atm-x-description/
19.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/988676/dvpcc/false/
20.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: What is Air Traffic Management e Xploration?
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/centers-and-facilities/ames/what-is-air-traffic-management-exploration/
21.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: NAS A Working to Bring Air Mobility Vision to Stratospheric Heights
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/centers-and-facilities/ames/nasa-working-to-bring-air-mobility-vision-to-stratospheric-heights/
22.
Source: grc.nasa.gov
Link:https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/UEET/StudentSite/dynamicsofflight.html
23.
Source: time.com
Title: See the Norwegian Town at the Center of a UFO Mania
Link:https://time.com/3824196/see-the-norwegian-town-at-the-center-of-a-ufo-mania/
24.
Source: spookyvalley.web.app
Title: Aguadilla UFO Video | Spooky Valley
Link:https://spookyvalley.web.app/events/ufo-2013-aguadilla-puerto-rico-thermal/
25.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: Official UAP Imagery
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/4/
26.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-Trends/
27.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/quot/
28.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/ftag/MSF0951a18/
29.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Inactive-Parent/Next-UAP-Imagery-dup/
30.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: Congressional Tab DT
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/AARO-Congressional-Tab-DT/
31.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-Congressional-Press-Products/
32.
Source: www1.grc.nasa.gov
Title: bernoulli and newton
Link:https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/beginners-guide-to-aeronautics/bernoulli-and-newton/
33.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: NAS A’s Picture Dictionary
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/nasas-picture-dictionary-a
34.
Source: valledaostaglocal.it
Title: ufo dal 1947 ad oggi circa 80 avvistamenti in valle
Link:https://www.valledaostaglocal.it/2014/03/01/leggi-notizia/argomenti/attualita-2/articolo/ufo-dal-1947-ad-oggi-circa-80-avvistamenti-in-valle.html
Source snippet
AostaCronacaUFO: Dal 1947 ad oggi circa 80 avvistamenti in Valle - Valledaostaglocal.it...
35.
Source: towerforensics.co.uk
Title: what is exif data and how can digital forensics aid in image analysis
Link:https://www.towerforensics.co.uk/blog/what-is-exif-data-and-how-can-digital-forensics-aid-in-image-analysis/
Source snippet
Tower ForensicsWhat is EXIF Data and How Can Digital Forensics Aid in...8 Jul 2024 — When a photo is taken, EXIF data is automatically e...
Additional References
36.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.02057.x
Source snippet
Image blur caused by object motion attenuates high frequency content of images, making post-capture deblurring an ill-posed problem...
37.
Source: youtube.com
Title: CLEAREST UFO Footage EVER FILMED? Inside The Italian Alien Stalker Case
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJADBG-qsbw
Source snippet
The Calvine UFO Photo: The Clearest Proof of Aliens or Just Another Hoax? | Wion Podcast...
38.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mo4A_gRr90w
Source snippet
UFO Encounters In Europe | Never-Seen-Before Evidence...
39.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Fascist UFOs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojvSWFiJiec
Source snippet
CLEAREST UFO Footage EVER FILMED? Inside The Italian Alien Stalker Case...
40.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO Encounters In Europe | Never-Seen-Before Evidence!
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7FS9BXBa8E
Source snippet
More Weird UFO Files Just Released: Forensic Expert Analysis...
41.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392920789_Forensic_Value_of_Exif_Data_An_Analytical_Evaluation_of_Metadata_Integrity_across_Image_Transfer_Methods
42.
Source: microsoft.com
Link:https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Criminisi_PhDThesis.pdf
43.
Source: bufora.org.uk
Link:https://www.bufora.org.uk/sightings/analysis-of-ufo-photographs
44.
Source: crime-scene-investigator.net
Link:https://www.crime-scene-investigator.net/best-practices-for-image-authentication.html
45.
Source: foilforum.it
Link:https://www.foilforum.it/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=9586