Within Calabria UFO Files
Did the Rende Photographs Capture a UFO?
Multiple witnesses and photographs confirm that lights were seen near Rende, but not what they were, how far away they were or how large.
On this page
- What witnesses reported on 13 June 2004
- What the published photographs establish
- Aircraft, balloons and other unresolved possibilities
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The incident commonly described as the “2004 Rende lights” appears to be misdated. The surviving contemporary reports place it on the night of 13 June 2010, with news coverage published the following morning. They describe three strong yellow lights moving over Rende, near Cosenza, while journalist Giulia Fresca and other residents watched. Fresca also took photographs.[nuovacosenza.com]nuovacosenza.comUfo a Cosenza? Avvistamenti notturniNuova Cosenza Quotidiano d'informazione della Calabria…

Those photographs make the sighting more substantial than an unsupported memory or second-hand story: they confirm that luminous points were present in the sky and that at least one witness recorded them at the time. They do not, however, reveal the lights’ distance, altitude, physical size or identity. No publicly available technical examination, original camera files, radar record or official case report has been found that would turn the images into evidence of an extraordinary aircraft.
The Rende case therefore matters within Calabria’s UFO history as a well-publicised but weakly resolved photographic incident. Something was seen and photographed; what it was remains uncertain.
What witnesses reported on 13 June 2010
According to the reports published on 14 June, the lights appeared late in the evening after a particularly hot day. Fresca said numerous people were still outdoors enjoying the cooler night air, giving the incident a wider audience than a solitary observation. The surviving coverage does not name or interview those additional witnesses individually, however, so their number, viewing positions and independence cannot now be assessed.[nuovacosenza.com]nuovacosenza.comUfo a Cosenza? Avvistamenti notturniNuova Cosenza Quotidiano d'informazione della Calabria…
Fresca described three bright, circular lights travelling approximately from south to north, parallel to a main road. Two appeared side by side and moved at the same speed, with the third following. She said the lights then formed a triangle, later rearranged themselves into a line and finally rose or receded rapidly until they disappeared. Their colour was described as a strong, steady yellow rather than a flashing aviation light. No sound was reported.[nuovacosenza.com]nuovacosenza.comUfo a Cosenza? Avvistamenti notturniNuova Cosenza Quotidiano d'informazione della Calabria…
The account contains several features that naturally attracted UFO interest:
- more than one light was visible;
- their relative positions reportedly changed;
- witnesses perceived coordinated movement;
- the lights appeared steady rather than obviously blinking;
- no engine noise was heard;
- photographs were taken during the observation.
None of those details is trivial, but several depend on visual estimates made at night. The statement that the lights were flying at “low” altitude, for example, was not based on a measured range. A bright point against a dark sky provides almost no reliable depth information. An object kilometres away can appear close, while changes in brightness or viewing angle can create an impression of climbing, acceleration or sudden disappearance.
There is also no surviving continuous video establishing the full sequence from parallel formation to triangle, line and departure. The most dramatic part of the story therefore rests on testimony rather than on a measurable photographic track.
The date problem is part of the evidence
The assignment of the case to 2004 is not supported by the accessible record. Two independent local reports explicitly date the article to 14 June 2010 and describe the lights as having appeared “yesterday”, placing the event on 13 June 2010. One page is preserved in a 2010 section of the Nuova Cosenza archive; CN24TV likewise gives a publication date of 14 June 2010.[nuovacosenza.com]nuovacosenza.comUfo a Cosenza? Avvistamenti notturniNuova Cosenza Quotidiano d'informazione della Calabria…
An ANSA-derived item carried by La Gazzetta del Mezzogiorno also begins “Cosenza, 14 June” and repeats the three-light account. Its web address contains the number “200408”, which may have encouraged later confusion, but that number is an article identifier rather than reliable evidence of a 2004 publication date.[La Gazzetta del Mezzogiorno]lagazzettadelmezzogiorno.itLa Gazzetta del MezzogiornoAvvistato Ufo in cieli Calabria(ANSA) - COSENZA, 14 GIU - Tre luci alte nel cielo di Rende, in Calabria…
This correction matters because case chronology is not a cosmetic detail. A six-year error affects searches for aviation activity, weather, public events, balloon releases, official reports and contemporary witnesses. It may also explain why attempts to locate a distinct Rende photographic incident from June 2004 produce little or no corroborating material.
The safest conclusion is that the well-known three-light photographic sighting occurred in 2010, unless a separate 2004 case can be demonstrated through contemporary documentation. Treating the date as settled at 2004 would repeat an archival error rather than clarify Calabria’s UFO record.
What the published photographs establish
The accessible Nuova Cosenza page includes an enlarged image identified as a photograph of the sighting. In the available reproduction, the lights are small, bright features against a largely featureless dark field. The photograph supports the basic claim that the camera registered luminous sources, but it does not show a visible fuselage, surface, outline or single dark object joining the lights.[nuovacosenza.com]nuovacosenza.comUfo a Cosenza? Avvistamenti notturniNuova Cosenza Quotidiano d'informazione della Calabria…
That distinction is fundamental. Three lights arranged as a triangle are not automatically three corners of one triangular craft. They may be three independent objects at different distances. A two-dimensional photograph collapses those distances into the same image plane, making unrelated lights appear to form a meaningful shape.
The published material can reasonably support only a limited set of findings:
There were photographed points of light.
The incident is not solely a later recollection. At least one image was circulated with contemporary reporting.
The camera recorded brightness and relative angular position.
It shows where the lights appeared within the frame, but not their physical separation.
The lights cannot be sized from the reproduction.
Without distance, lens information and an object of known scale at approximately the same range, a few bright pixels cannot be converted into metres.
The still image does not demonstrate speed.
A single frame cannot establish whether the lights were stationary, drifting, flying rapidly or affected by camera movement.
It does not establish one solid object.
No connecting structure is visible in the published version.
This is consistent with the broader problem identified in modern official studies of anomalous aerial imagery. NASA’s independent UAP study noted that many reports lack the data and metadata needed to determine an object’s size, motion or nature conclusively. The US All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office similarly stresses that imagery without dependable range, sensor and contextual data may be insufficient to assess performance or calculate physical size.[nasa.gov]nasa.govuap independent study team final report 0UNIDENTIFIED ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA…
What is missing from a serious photographic analysis
A useful forensic assessment would begin with the original, unedited files rather than a compressed newspaper copy. No public source located for the Rende case provides a documented examination of those originals.
The missing information includes:
- the camera make and model;
- lens focal length and zoom setting;
- exposure time, aperture and sensitivity;
- original timestamps and embedded metadata;
- whether the camera was handheld or supported;
- the photographer’s exact position and viewing direction;
- uncropped frames taken immediately before and after;
- fixed landmarks or stars usable for orientation;
- the duration between photographs;
- weather and wind measurements;
- aircraft or helicopter traffic for the relevant time;
- statements from named independent witnesses;
- radar or air-traffic-control information.
Exposure time is particularly important. During a long handheld exposure, even a steady aircraft light or distant lamp can become enlarged, elongated or displaced. Camera shake may also change the apparent arrangement of lights between frames. Conversely, if several short exposures preserved the same sharply defined formation against identifiable stars, the evidential value would be greater.
Original metadata would not identify the objects by itself, but it could test whether the photographs were taken when claimed and help calculate their angular movement. Multiple images containing fixed stars or buildings could also distinguish motion of the camera from motion of the lights. None of that work is documented in the surviving articles.
There is no clear allegation that Fresca manipulated the photographs. The weakness lies not in demonstrated fakery but in the limited information preserved. Authentic photographs of real lights can still be incapable of identifying their source.
Aircraft, balloons and other unresolved possibilities
The original report argued against military aircraft because the lights did not visibly blink and no noise was heard. That observation deserves consideration, but it is not enough to exclude aviation.
Distant aircraft
Aircraft seen nearly head-on can present powerful landing lights while their coloured navigation lights remain difficult to distinguish. At sufficient distance, engine noise may be weak, delayed, masked by urban sound or carried away by wind. Several aircraft following similar routes can also appear as a slowly changing group because perspective compresses the distances between them.
The alleged change from triangle to line is compatible with separate moving sources viewed from below or at a shallow angle. As their relative positions change, three independent lights can briefly form recognisable geometric patterns without belonging to one craft. AARO has resolved some modern multi-light footage as separate commercial aircraft at great distance after combining imagery with flight data—a reminder that formation-like appearances alone are not diagnostic.[AARO]aaro.milUAP Imagery# UAP ImageryThe available data is insufficient to evaluate the phenomenon’s performance characteristics…. Objects | Analysis of the full motion vi…
Aircraft remain a plausible explanation, but not a demonstrated one. The Rende reports do not provide traffic records or sufficiently precise timing to test the hypothesis.
Lanterns or illuminated balloons
Small fire balloons or sky lanterns commonly produce steady yellow, orange or reddish lights. Released in groups, they can drift together, spread apart, appear to change formation and vanish when their flames fail or when they enter cloud. Their silence would also fit the Rende testimony.
The main objection is Fresca’s description of the lights moving together and then departing rapidly upwards. Yet both speed and ascent were visual impressions made without a known distance. A nearby slow light and a distant fast light can have the same apparent angular movement. Wind at altitude may also differ considerably from conditions at street level.
No contemporary report identifies a celebration, launch site or recovered lantern. The balloon explanation is therefore possible rather than proven.
Helicopters or military activity
Three helicopters could account for coordinated lights and changing geometry, but the reported silence is a difficulty if they truly were nearby. The absence of blinking lights would also require either poor visibility of their navigation lighting or an inaccurate witness impression.
The suggestion of military exercises appears to have originated as a possibility raised and rejected within the witness account, not from confirmed knowledge of military activity that night. No document in the accessible reporting links the sighting to a base, exercise, radar detection or official aviation investigation.[nuovacosenza.com]nuovacosenza.comUfo a Cosenza? Avvistamenti notturniNuova Cosenza Quotidiano d'informazione della Calabria…
Military aircraft should therefore not be invoked either as an explanation or as evidence of secrecy without supporting records.
Astronomical objects
Stars and planets can appear unusually bright and may seem to move because of cloud, observer motion or the autokinetic effect—the illusion that a fixed point is moving when viewed against a dark, featureless background. They are less satisfactory as a complete explanation if the witnesses accurately observed three lights travelling together over a short period and changing their relative positions.
Meteors are also a poor fit because they normally cross the sky in seconds rather than maintaining a formation. Satellites may travel silently and steadily, but three bright yellow lights apparently rearranging themselves would require a more specific match than the published information allows.
Astronomical explanations cannot be ruled out for individual lights, but the reported sequence is more naturally compatible with aircraft, balloons or another group of airborne objects.
Was there an official investigation?
No accessible evidence shows that the Rende photographs received a formal technical investigation by the Italian Air Force, civil aviation authorities, police or a photographic laboratory. The contemporary articles reproduce the witness statement but do not cite radar checks, flight enquiries, image measurements or interviews conducted by an investigating body.[nuovacosenza.com]nuovacosenza.comUfo a Cosenza? Avvistamenti notturniNuova Cosenza Quotidiano d'informazione della Calabria…
This absence should not be described as an official refusal to investigate. Many civilian reports never reach the military reporting system, and press coverage alone does not create an official case file. The Italian Air Force’s published lists of reports from 2010 to 2013, later summarised by Avvenire, contain numerous sightings from around Italy but do not list the 13 June Rende incident. That may mean it was not formally submitted, did not enter the released archive or was handled outside that particular dataset. It does not demonstrate suppression.[Avvenire]avvenire.itgli avvistamenti tra il 2010 e il 2013 14789Gli avvistamenti tra il 2010 e il 2013…
The regional UFO catalogue maintained by the Centro Italiano Studi Ufologici provides a broader setting for such cases. Its expanded Calabria edition contains 1,164 reports, each intended to include documentary sources and assessments of reliability and strangeness. CISU presents cataloguing as a continuing archival process rather than confirmation that the recorded phenomena are extraordinary.[CISU]cisu.orgUFO in Calabria: il catalogo dei casiUFO in Calabria: il catalogo dei casi - CISU - Centro Italiano Studi Ufologici…
The Rende event fits that distinction well: it belongs in the historical record because it generated testimony, photographs and press reports, but its inclusion would not settle its physical cause.
Did later reporting strengthen the claim?
Later online repetition has preserved the story, but it has not materially strengthened the evidence. The principal reports use nearly identical wording, indicating that they derive from the same statement or news-agency item rather than from separate investigations. Repetition across several websites therefore should not be mistaken for multiple corroborating sources.[nuovacosenza.com]nuovacosenza.comUfo a Cosenza? Avvistamenti notturniNuova Cosenza Quotidiano d'informazione della Calabria…
No later source located during this review supplies:
- additional named witnesses;
- the complete sequence of original photographs;
- a technical image report;[nasa.gov]nasa.govUPDAT E: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report; Names DirectorUPDAT E: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report; Names Director
- verified camera metadata;
- aircraft or radar records;
- a reconstruction from the photographer’s position;
- a confirmed conventional identification;
- evidence of an object displaying exceptional performance.
The case has consequently become more widely circulated without becoming better documented. In fact, the apparent migration of its date from 2010 to 2004 weakens confidence in later summaries, because it shows how easily a basic fact can change as reports are copied.
That does not erase the original observation. It means the evidential chain remains close to where it began: one detailed witness account, reports of other unnamed observers and a limited set of published photographs.
A balanced assessment
The Rende lights should not be dismissed as an invented event. Contemporary local reporting supports the conclusion that three lights were seen over Rende on 13 June 2010 and that Giulia Fresca photographed them. The account was specific enough to preserve direction, colour, formation changes and the witnesses’ impression of silent movement.[nuovacosenza.com]nuovacosenza.comUfo a Cosenza? Avvistamenti notturniNuova Cosenza Quotidiano d'informazione della Calabria…
Nor should the photographs be described as proof that a single UFO craft was present. They document luminous points, not a structured vehicle. The evidence does not establish distance, altitude, dimensions, speed or extraordinary manoeuvring. The published frames are compatible with several ordinary possibilities, especially separate aircraft or drifting illuminated balloons, although the information needed to choose confidently between them is missing.
The most defensible classification is therefore unresolved because of insufficient data, not confirmed as extraordinary and not conclusively debunked. Its main value within Calabria’s UFO history is methodological. The case shows why photographs can confirm that witnesses saw something while still failing to answer the more important question of what that something was.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Did the Rende Photographs Capture a UFO?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
Cited by the New York Review of Books as "the best brief for visitation," this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Re...
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • Impeccably researched, this riveting journalistic investigation separates fact from fiction, and documents th...
Bad Astronomy
A clever, thought-provoking guide that attacks common astronomical misconceptions What is Bad Astronomy? Anything that accidentally or in...
The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • From the renowned astronomer and author of Cosmos comes a “powerful [and] stirring defense of informed ration...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Current eBay listing
VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT
Current eBay listing
I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print
Endnotes
1.
Source: nuovacosenza.com
Title: Ufo a Cosenza? Avvistamenti notturni
Link:https://www.nuovacosenza.com/hint/10/giugno/14/ufo.html
Source snippet
Nuova Cosenza Quotidiano d'informazione della Calabria...
2.
Source: cn24tv.it
Title: Ufo avvistati nei cieli della Calabria
Link:https://cn24tv.it/news/ufo-avvistati-nei-cieli-della-calabria/
Source snippet
Ufo avvistati nei cieli della Calabria - CN24TV...
3.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: uap independent study team final report 0
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report-0.pdf?emrc=67322e8f26f79
Source snippet
UNIDENTIFIED ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA...
4.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: UAP Imagery# UAP Imagery
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/
Source snippet
The available data is insufficient to evaluate the phenomenon’s performance characteristics.... Objects | Analysis of the full motion vi...
5.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: UNCLASSIFIEDaccompanying metadata are no longer available
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/case_resolution_reports/AARO_GoFast_Case_Resolution_Card_Methodology_Final.pdf?ver=qXvjrruO_0MgtnTsfYnCEQ%3D%3D
Source snippet
• The range (distance) from the FLIR sensor to the target.... AARO could not determine the object’s size due to the video’s low resoluti...
6.
Source: avvenire.it
Title: gli avvistamenti tra il 2010 e il 2013 14789
Link:https://www.avvenire.it/agora/scienza/gli-avvistamenti-tra-il-2010-e-il-2013_14789
Source snippet
Gli avvistamenti tra il 2010 e il 2013...
7.
Source: cisu.org
Title: UFO in Calabria: il catalogo dei casi
Link:https://www.cisu.org/ufo-in-calabria-il-catalogo-dei-casi/
Source snippet
UFO in Calabria: il catalogo dei casi - CISU - Centro Italiano Studi Ufologici...
8.
Source: cisu.org
Title: UFO In Calabria
Link:https://www.cisu.org/ufo-in-calabria-presentazione-e-introduzione/
Source snippet
UFO In Calabria - presentazione e introduzione - CISU - Centro Italiano Studi Ufologici...
9.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-Imagery-Acc-Table/
10.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-UAP-Report-Documents/poster/dividLink/
11.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/faqs/
12.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/
13.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/
14.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006079/dvpcc/false/
15.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: UPDAT E: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report; Names Director
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/update-nasa-shares-uap-independent-study-report-names-director/
16.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: NAS A to Release, Discuss Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Report
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-to-release-discuss-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-report/
17.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1010263/dvpcc/false/
18.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1007707/dvpcc/false/
19.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006105/dvpmoduleid/77396/
20.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006093/dvpcc/false/
21.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: Latest Updates from NASA on IMAGE Recovery
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/solar-system/latest-updates-from-nasa-on-image-recovery/
22.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: Apollo 11 Photogrammetry
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/static/history/alsj/a11/a11Photogrammetry.html
23.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20120001912
24.
Source: nuovacosenza.com
Title: Nuova Cosenza
Link:https://www.nuovacosenza.com/cs/giugno0105.html
25.
Source: nuovacosenza.com
Title: Nuova Cosenza
Link:https://www.nuovacosenza.com/cs/maggio2831.html
26.
Source: nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov
Title: display All.cfm
Link:https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/displayAll.cfm?Internal_ID=N_PR_86210001&page_name=ALL
27.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19720028168
28.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Inactive-Parent/Next-UAP-Imagery-dup/
29.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-Trends/
30.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: AAR O UAP Trends UAP REPORTING TRENDS
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/UAP-Reporting-Trends/quot/
31.
Source: eol.jsc.nasa.gov
Link:https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/FAQ/
32.
Source: eol.jsc.nasa.gov
Link:https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/searchphotos/Metadata/Apollo9.htm
33.
Source: nuovacosenza.com
Link:https://www.nuovacosenza.com/cs/10/giugno/ultime.html
34.
Source: history.com
Title: uss nimitz 2004 tic tac ufo encounter
Link:https://www.history.com/articles/uss-nimitz-2004-tic-tac-ufo-encounter
35.
Source: esrs.jsc.nasa.gov
Link:https://esrs.jsc.nasa.gov/SearchPhotos/Metadata/Apollo7.htm
36.
Source: lagazzettadelmezzogiorno.it
Link:https://www.lagazzettadelmezzogiorno.it/news/italia/200408/avvistato-ufo-in-cieli-calabria.html
Source snippet
La Gazzetta del MezzogiornoAvvistato Ufo in cieli Calabria(ANSA) - COSENZA, 14 GIU - Tre luci alte nel cielo di Rende, in Calabria...
37.
Source: ilmeteo.it
Link:https://www.ilmeteo.it/portale/archivio-meteo/San%2BMichele%2BSalentino/2004/Giugno/13
38.
Source: ilmeteo.it
Link:https://www.ilmeteo.it/portale/archivio-meteo/Scheggia%2Be%2BPascelupo/2004/Giugno/13
39.
Source: ilmeteo.it
Link:https://www.ilmeteo.it/portale/archivio-meteo/Castelbianco/2004/Giugno/13
40.
Source: ilmeteo.it
Link:https://www.ilmeteo.it/portale/archivio-meteo/Mirandola/2004/Giugno/13
41.
Source: ilmeteo.it
Link:https://www.ilmeteo.it/portale/archivio-meteo/Castelverde/2004/Giugno/13
42.
Source: ilmeteo.it
Link:https://www.ilmeteo.it/portale/archivio-meteo/Marina%2Bdi%2BGrosseto/2004/Giugno/13
43.
Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Link:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7971b7ed915d07d35b5898/UFOReports2004WholeoftheUK.pdf
44.
Source: it.scribd.com
Link:https://it.scribd.com/document/490374032/Ufo
45.
Source: uapcheck.com
Link:https://www.uapcheck.com/it/notizie/casi/
Additional References
46.
Source: youtube.com
Title: THEY ARE HERE: UFO Hunters: The Italian Ufologists | Full 4K ufo documentary
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNLQ3zan12c
Source snippet
Strange lights. Unexplained encounters. Shocking truths | TOP 20 UFO ENCOUNTERS IN EUROPE...
47.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9I84_R4L4A
Source snippet
Did a Fighter Jet Really Chase a UFO in 1979?...
48.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO Files #7: UFO Invasion in Italy
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhZOvhOFBuw
Source snippet
THEY ARE HERE: UFO Hunters: The Italian Ufologists | Full 4K ufo documentary...
49.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/1dgc8od/are_there_good_scientific_explanations_for_ufo/
50.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/livescience/posts/bizarre-ufo-like-halo-of-red-light-appears-over-small-italian-town-for-the-secon/1219530610036977/
51.
Source: riminisparita.it
Link:https://riminisparita.it/ufo-bellaria-1978/
52.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/p/DVifLJACGl2/
53.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/giuliafresca/
54.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/p/Da9zEMMFa_s/
55.
Source: radioradicale.it
Link:https://www.radioradicale.it/scheda/159678/la-politica-dellunione-europea-per-il-mediterraneo-la-lista-uniti-nellulivo-che-si