Within Molise UFOs
How Guglionesi Became Molise's UFO Hotspot
A burst of light reports and television attention turned Guglionesi into a regional hotspot without producing a strong technical record.
On this page
- The cluster of 2017 reports
- How national television amplified the story
- What evidence would confirm a genuine flap
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Guglionesi became Molise’s best-known UFO hotspot in 2017 after several reports of white spheres, flashing lights and a low-flying luminous object were presented as parts of a local “flap” — a short period in which sightings appear to cluster in one place. The most clearly dated claims occurred on 28 February and 5 April, although older, less precisely dated stories were folded into the same narrative. A visit by investigators from the Centro Ufologico Mediterraneo, followed by national television coverage in December, transformed a handful of witness accounts into a story about an Italian “Area 51”.[RAI Play]raiplay.itRAI Play AgoràRAI PlayAgorà - Area 51 italiana - 20/12/2017 - Video - RaiPlay…
The episode matters within Molise’s UFO history because it produced far more publicity than technical evidence. There were named witnesses, a photograph and claims of several observers, but the surviving reports do not provide original image files, reliable distance measurements, astronomical checks, radar information or a published investigation showing how ordinary explanations were excluded. Guglionesi was therefore a genuine media and reporting hotspot, but not a securely demonstrated concentration of extraordinary aerial events.
The cluster of 2017 reports
The case family was assembled principally by the Centro Ufologico Mediterraneo, commonly shortened to CUFOM, after it received what its representatives described as numerous calls from Guglionesi. CUFOM’s honorary president, electronics engineer Ennio Piccaluga, travelled to the town and interviewed residents who wished to describe unusual lights. The fullest contemporary account appeared in May 2017, written by Piccaluga himself rather than by an independent reporter. That authorship is important: the article is valuable for reconstructing the claims, but it also presents the investigator’s interpretation and the witnesses’ stories through the same UFO-oriented source.[Blasting News]it.blastingnews.comBlasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italianeBlasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italiane
The accounts grouped under the Guglionesi label were not all observations of the same object on the same night. They differed in date, setting, number of lights, apparent motion and proximity. In practice, the “flap” was a collection of several episodes linked by location and by the broad description of luminous spheres.
One woman, identified only by initials, reportedly awoke at about three in the morning after light entered a room near her sleeping child. She said she saw three brilliant white spheres floating outside the balcony, each estimated to be roughly half a metre across. According to the published version, she went to wake her husband, but the lights had disappeared by the time he responded. No exact date was supplied, and the husband apparently did not see the objects. The reported size and proximity were therefore estimates made by a single witness without a recorded comparison object or photograph.[Blasting News]it.blastingnews.comBlasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italianeBlasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italiane
A doctor was said to have seen a white sphere pass rapidly beside his car on a country road. Another resident, identified as P.D., described a luminous object towards Termoli descending with an oscillating, “falling-leaf” motion before stopping briefly and departing quickly to the south. Neither account, as publicly preserved, includes an exact time, route, duration, weather record, named corroborating witness or image. They contribute to the impression of repeated activity, but cannot readily be compared with aircraft, planets, balloons, lanterns or other possible sources.[Blasting News]it.blastingnews.comBlasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italianeBlasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italiane
The 28 February encounter
The most elaborate story was placed at approximately 10 p.m. on Tuesday, 28 February 2017. A witness identified as E.T. said that, while closing a business on the edge of Guglionesi, he noticed an elliptical object above the roof. He compared its apparent width with the Moon and believed it was no more than 100 metres away, leading him to estimate a physical size of three or four metres. The object allegedly emitted repeated downward flashes at intervals of slightly under one second.[Blasting News]it.blastingnews.comBlasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italianeBlasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italiane
E.T. said he drove home because he was frightened and believed that the object followed him. From a seventh-floor flat, he and several family members reportedly watched it remain nearby and continue flashing before it disappeared. This is potentially the strongest account in the cluster because it claims several witnesses and a sustained observation from two locations. Yet the public report does not include separate statements from those relatives, a mapped route, photographs, video, exact bearings or an explanation of how the object’s distance was determined.[Blasting News]it.blastingnews.comBlasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italianeBlasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italiane
The description also illustrates a recurring weakness in luminous-object cases: apparent size and distance are easily confused when an observer is looking at a light against a dark sky. Comparing an object to the Moon establishes an angular size — how large it looks — but does not reveal its real dimensions unless its distance is independently known. The estimates of “100 metres” and “three or four metres” therefore appear to be witness judgements rather than measurements.
Repeated downward beams might suggest a searchlight, moving spotlight, drone, aircraft or lighting effect, but the published account supplies too little positional information to test any of those possibilities. Conversely, the absence of a demonstrated conventional explanation does not make the object extraordinary; it means the evidence available to later readers is insufficient for a reliable identification.
The photograph of 5 April
The final specifically dated Guglionesi report occurred at about 7 p.m. on 5 April 2017. Giuseppe Totaro and two companions were said to be near a petrol station on the road towards Termoli when they noticed a white sphere in the sky. Totaro took one photograph before the object apparently disappeared. Unlike the balcony story, this incident had a publicly named witness and at least two reported companions.[Blasting News]it.blastingnews.comBlasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italianeBlasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italiane
Even so, the evidential value of the photograph cannot be judged from the surviving articles. They do not publish a technical examination of the original file, its metadata, the camera settings, focal length, exposure time or an uncompressed sequence of images. Nor is there enough information to establish the object’s altitude, distance or speed. A small bright feature in a single photograph could represent a distant aircraft, balloon, bird reflecting sunlight, optical flare, sensor artefact or an object whose identity cannot be recovered from the image alone.
The account’s phraseology — including the suggestion that the sphere appeared to be watching the group — goes beyond what a photograph could establish. It describes the witnesses’ impression rather than a measurable behaviour. The picture may document that Totaro photographed something bright, but the available reporting does not demonstrate what that something was.
How television created a national hotspot
The local claims received their greatest exposure on 20 December 2017, when the Rai 3 current-affairs programme Agorà broadcast a three-minute segment titled “Italian Area 51”. Rai’s description said that several recent reports had reached CUFOM and that reporter Simone Carolei had gone in search of an Italian counterpart to the secretive American test site. That framing gave a modest rural town a memorable national label, even though no military installation, restricted airspace or secret research programme was involved.[RAI Play]raiplay.itRAI Play AgoràRAI PlayAgorà - Area 51 italiana - 20/12/2017 - Video - RaiPlay…
A Molise local-history website recorded that the programme discussed sightings said to date from 5 April and included interviews with residents. It also noted a sceptical response from former politician Antonio Di Pietro, who suggested that ordinary street lighting might be involved. The available text does not show that this specific explanation was tested against each witness location, but its inclusion demonstrates that the television treatment was not wholly uncritical.[La terra in mezzo]laterrainmezzo.altervista.orgLa terra in mezzo Avvistamenti UFO a Guglionesi | La terra in mezzoLa terra in mezzo Avvistamenti UFO a Guglionesi | La terra in mezzo
Television nevertheless changed the scale of the story. Reports that had circulated through a UFO organisation and online articles were repackaged as a distinctive feature of Guglionesi itself. By December, the balcony spheres and Totaro photograph were being repeated together, despite their different circumstances and the absence of evidence that they shared a cause. The label “flap” encouraged audiences to interpret them collectively rather than as several separate, poorly documented observations.
The timing also benefited from wider interest in UFOs. The Agorà segment aired days after major international reporting about a former United States government programme that had examined military UFO reports. Piccaluga’s own website stated that the programme discussed those American revelations alongside sightings of white spheres, particularly those in Guglionesi. This juxtaposition could make the Molise claims seem connected to a broader official mystery, although no evidence linked them to military encounters or government investigations.[Ennio PICCALUGA]epiccaluga.wordpress.comUna caratteristica inattesa poi è l’aumento di velocità subito a più riprese dall’ oggetto, con un’ accelerazione ben superiore a quella…
In January 2018, Rai News reported CUFOM’s claim that 2017 had been a remarkable year for Italian flying-saucer reports and listed Guglionesi among many towns represented by photographs or films in the organisation’s dossier. A separate retrospective described Molise as having an unusually high rate of sightings for its population and area. Neither publication supplied the calculations needed to verify that regional comparison, and the claim sat uneasily beside figures from other Italian UFO groups showing that reports nationally had actually fallen slightly in 2017.[blastingnews.com]it.blastingnews.comle foto dei migliori avvistamenti ufo del 2017 002275563Blasting NewsLe foto dei migliori avvistamenti UFO del 2017…
The Centro Italiano Studi Ufologici explicitly criticised sensational suggestions that 2017 had produced an exceptional Italian wave. It noted that its own data, along with figures from the Centro Ufologico Nazionale and the Italian Air Force, indicated a declining rather than rising national trend. This does not disprove individual Guglionesi sightings, but it weakens the broader claim that they formed part of an extraordinary nationwide surge.[CISU - Centro Italiano Studi Ufologici]cisu.orgCentro Italiano Studi Ufologici Confermata da CUN e A.Mla diminuzione di avvistamenti - CISU - Centro Italiano Studi UfologiciJanuary 21, 2018 — Dopo la pubblicazione dei dati del CISU circa l…
Investigation without a technical record
CUFOM representatives said that they carried out field inquiries and spoke with witnesses. The May article confirms that Piccaluga visited Guglionesi, while later coverage stated that photographs and films submitted to the organisation had been examined by its specialists. However, no publicly accessible case report has been located that sets out the Guglionesi investigation in a reproducible form: witness interview dates, site diagrams, original media, weather and astronomical data, aircraft enquiries, competing hypotheses and reasons for rejecting them.[Blasting News]it.blastingnews.comBlasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italianeBlasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italiane
This gap is more significant than whether an investigator personally found the accounts persuasive. A technical investigation must allow another researcher to retrace the analysis. For example, the 5 April photograph would ideally be released in its original format, with metadata preserved and nearby landmarks used to calculate the camera direction. The 28 February account would need a mapped line of sight from both the business and the flat, as well as independent statements from each family member.
There is also no indication in the accessible reporting that the claims were formally submitted through Italy’s official reporting route. The Italian Air Force has been responsible for collecting and checking such reports since the national wave of 1978. Witnesses are instructed to complete an official form and deliver it to the Carabinieri, after which investigators can seek correlations with aircraft, human activity or natural phenomena.[Aeronautica Militare]aeronautica.difesa.itAeronautica Militare OVNIAeronautica Militare OVNI
The absence of a visible Air Force case should not be treated as proof that no report was ever made. It does mean that the Guglionesi story, as publicly documented, rests on private investigation and media coverage rather than an identifiable official finding. Nor would an official classification as unidentified establish an exotic origin: it would only mean that no correlation had been found from the information available.
The surviving material also contains language that blurs observation with speculation. The three balcony lights were described as though they might have been observing a child; the April sphere was said to appear interested in witnesses; and the February flashes were likened to a search. These interpretations may accurately convey how witnesses felt, but they attribute purpose to lights whose distance, shape and physical nature were not established.[Blasting News]it.blastingnews.comBlasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italianeBlasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italiane
What could explain the lights?
No single conventional explanation neatly covers every Guglionesi account because the reports describe different events. That is precisely why treating them as one phenomenon is risky. Each episode requires its own reconstruction.
The balcony lights might have involved nearby lighting reflected in glass, vehicle lamps, a drone, lanterns or another source whose apparent position was distorted by darkness. The lack of an exact date prevents checks against weather, local events or astronomical objects. The husband’s failure to see them is not evidence against the witness’s sincerity, but it leaves the account without independent visual confirmation.
The fast sphere reported beside a car is especially difficult to interpret because motion viewed from a moving vehicle can be deceptive. A distant fixed light may appear to move rapidly when foreground objects and the observer’s position change. Without a direction of travel, road alignment and duration, the claimed speed cannot be calculated.
The descending light towards Termoli could have been an aircraft approaching the coastal area, a lantern or balloon carried by the wind, or a bright celestial object distorted by haze. The reported “falling-leaf” motion is interesting but subjective unless it can be plotted against fixed landmarks.
The 28 February object is harder to reduce to a simple distant planet because witnesses allegedly saw repeated flashes and later observed it from a flat. Possibilities such as a drone, helicopter, spotlight or lighting equipment would depend on whether the claimed silence, proximity and movement were accurately perceived. The published story says that the sky was veiled, a condition that can make beams, reflections and distant lights appear diffuse or suspended, but it provides no detailed meteorological record with which to test that possibility.[Blasting News]it.blastingnews.comBlasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italianeBlasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italiane
The 5 April image may remain unidentified at the level of the surviving copy, but “unidentified in a photograph” is a weak conclusion. Single bright spots are among the least diagnostic forms of UFO evidence because they normally lack range, scale and shape. Without the original file or a sequence showing movement, the number of plausible explanations remains broad.
A bright meteor seen across central and southern Italy in September 2017 demonstrates another reason for caution when collecting luminous-object reports. Thousands of observers in Molise, Abruzzo, Puglia and Basilicata reported a brief greenish fireball. That event was geographically widespread and described consistently enough to be recognised as a bolide, rather than a local UFO flap. It was not one of the core Guglionesi incidents, but it shows how an impressive unexplained light can become identifiable when reports include matching times, directions and descriptions across a wide area.[inmeteo.net]inmeteo.netOpen source on inmeteo.net.
What would confirm a genuine flap?
A genuine concentration of anomalous events would require more than several stories gathered from the same town. The reports would need enough common detail to show that they represented a connected pattern rather than ordinary objects, perception errors and unrelated unexplained lights.
The strongest confirming evidence would include:
- independently recorded sightings with precise dates and times;
- original photographs or videos, not compressed copies or screenshots;
- identifiable landmarks and camera directions;
- separate witness statements collected before people compared accounts;
- aircraft, helicopter, drone and balloon checks;
- weather, wind and astronomical data;
- observations from more than one location, allowing triangulation;
- radar, acoustic or other instrument records;
- a published analysis explaining why ordinary alternatives failed.
Modern scientific proposals for investigating unidentified aerial phenomena make the same basic point: useful conclusions require several kinds of sensor data. Wide- and narrow-field cameras, range information, radar, radio receivers, microphones and environmental measurements allow investigators to distinguish real movement from optical artefacts and to calculate an object’s position and speed. Nothing comparable is publicly available for the Guglionesi reports.[arXiv]arxiv.orgOpen source on arxiv.org.
The 2017 cluster therefore remains a weakly documented case family rather than a technically confirmed flap. The testimony may reflect sincerely puzzling experiences, and the 28 February account deserves more attention than a stray photograph because several family members were reportedly present. Yet later reporting did not add the measurements, original records or independent analysis needed to strengthen the claims.
Guglionesi’s place in Molise’s UFO history
Guglionesi became Molise’s UFO hotspot mainly because several accounts were collected, narrated together and carried onto national television. It is unusual within the region not because it produced radar tracks, military documents or exceptional imagery, but because it generated a recognisable local mythology in a place with otherwise sparse UFO coverage.
The episode also shows how a flap can be created partly through reporting dynamics. Once investigators publicly identify a location as active, residents may reconsider older experiences, become more alert to ambiguous lights and feel more willing to report them. Media coverage then brings separate incidents together under one memorable label. This does not imply fraud or mass imagination; it means that the number of reports is influenced by attention as well as by whatever people are seeing.
Later coverage amplified rather than resolved the case. The December television segment and January retrospectives made Guglionesi nationally recognisable, but they largely repeated the original testimony. No subsequent technical publication appears to have validated the photograph, established a shared flight pattern, identified radar confirmation or shown that the luminous objects displayed measured capabilities beyond conventional aircraft or natural phenomena.
The fairest assessment is therefore that Guglionesi experienced a reporting and media flap in 2017. Several residents described unusual luminous objects, and at least one image was reportedly obtained. The evidence is sufficient to document a local UFO story and the way it spread, but not to confirm that a single unknown phenomenon repeatedly operated over the town. In Molise’s regional history, the case is most valuable as an example of how thin observations can become a prominent hotspot narrative when witness testimony, specialist advocacy and television attention converge.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to How Guglionesi Became Molise's UFO Hotspot. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Myth and Mystery of UFOs
When United Airlines workers reported a UFO at O'Hare Airport in November 2006, it was met with the typical denials and hush-up that usua...
How UFOs Conquered the World: The History of a Modern Myth
"Cover[s] all the major themes of ufology, ranging from lights in the sky to crashed saucers, government cover-ups and alien abductions ....
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
Cited by the New York Review of Books as "the best brief for visitation," this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...
The Believing Brain
Synthesizing thirty years of research, psychologist and science historian, Michael Shermer upends the traditional thinking about how huma...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Current eBay listing
VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT
Current eBay listing
I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print
Endnotes
1.
Source: epiccaluga.wordpress.com
Link:https://epiccaluga.wordpress.com/category/interviste-tv-radio-stampa/
Source snippet
Una caratteristica inattesa poi è l’aumento di velocità subito a più riprese dall’ oggetto, con un’ accelerazione ben superiore a quella...
2.
Source: rainews.it
Link:https://www.rainews.it/archivio-rainews/articoli/ContentItem-d2d9a049-1177-4761-870e-3ff059f44877.html
Source snippet
Ufo: il 2017 è stato l'anno dei dischi volanti in Italia. Pubblicato il dossier - Rai News...
3.
Source: rainews.it
Link:https://www.rainews.it/archivio-rainews/media/ContentItem-b49468aa-7479-4523-b31c-faaf6a6c7bcd.html
Source snippet
Calano gli avvistamenti di Ufo in Italia nel 2017 - photogallery - Rai NewsLieve calo degli avvistamenti in Italia di oggetti vola...
4.
Source: cisu.org
Title: Centro Italiano Studi Ufologici Confermata da CUN e A.M
Link:https://www.cisu.org/confermata-da-cun-e-a-m-la-diminuzione-di-avvistamenti/
Source snippet
la diminuzione di avvistamenti - CISU - Centro Italiano Studi UfologiciJanuary 21, 2018 — Dopo la pubblicazione dei dati del CISU circa l...
Published: January 21, 2018
5.
Source: inmeteo.net
Link:https://www.inmeteo.net/2017/09/10/grosso-bolide-luminoso-avvistato-nei-cieli-del-centro-sud-migliaia-di-segnalazioni/
6.
Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18566
7.
Source: rainews.it
Link:https://www.rainews.it/archivio-rainews/media/amp/ContentItem-b49468aa-7479-4523-b31c-faaf6a6c7bcd.html
8.
Source: rainews.it
Link:https://www.rainews.it/archivio-rainews/articoli/Ufo-il-2017-anno-dei-dischi-volanti-in-Italia-d2d9a049-1177-4761-870e-3ff059f44877.html
9.
Source: cisu.org
Title: CA T: gli avvistamenti UFO italiani in tempo reale!
Link:https://www.cisu.org/cisucat-gli-avvistamenti-ufo-italiani-in-tempo-reale/
10.
Source: legislature.camera.it
Link:https://legislature.camera.it/_dati/leg13/lavori/stenografici/sed653/s110.htm
11.
Source: regione.molise.it
Link:https://www.regione.molise.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeAttachment.php/L/IT/D/5%252F5%252F4%252FD.b19e816200c2a658a9ff/P/BLOB%3AID%3D17284/E/pdf?mode=download
12.
Source: cisu.org
Title: Avvistamenti italiani Archivi
Link:https://www.cisu.org/tag/avvistamenti-italiani/
13.
Source: cisu.org
Title: CU N Archivi
Link:https://www.cisu.org/tag/cun/
14.
Source: asrem.molise.it
Title: allegato A ammessi assistenti
Link:https://www.asrem.molise.it/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/allegato-A-ammessi-assistenti.pdf
15.
Source: raiplay.it
Title: RAI Play Agorà
Link:https://www.raiplay.it/video/2017/12/Area-51-italiana—20122017–945e2748-5f20-4aa8-a08e-f4eb00594031.html
Source snippet
RAI PlayAgorà - Area 51 italiana - 20/12/2017 - Video - RaiPlay...
16.
Source: it.blastingnews.com
Title: Blasting News UFO, sfere bianche avvistate in diverse località italiane
Link:https://it.blastingnews.com/cronaca/2017/05/ufo-sfere-bianche-avvistate-in-diverse-localita-italiane-001685183.html
17.
Source: it.blastingnews.com
Title: le foto dei migliori avvistamenti ufo del 2017 002275563
Link:https://it.blastingnews.com/tempo-libero/2018/01/le-foto-dei-migliori-avvistamenti-ufo-del-2017-002275563.html
Source snippet
Blasting NewsLe foto dei migliori avvistamenti UFO del 2017...
18.
Source: laterrainmezzo.altervista.org
Title: La terra in mezzo Avvistamenti UFO a Guglionesi | La terra in mezzo
Link:https://laterrainmezzo.altervista.org/avvistamenti-ufo-guglionesi/
19.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: Aeronautica Militare OVNI
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/ovni/
20.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/ModuloUFO.pdf
21.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it OVN I
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/en/2023/01/12/ovni/
22.
Source: it.blastingnews.com
Link:https://it.blastingnews.com/cronaca/2017/09/ufo-su-giugliano-in-campania-con-testimone-deccezione-indagine-del-cufom-002006753.html
23.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it CONCLUS O IL 2° MODULO ADDESTRATIVO PER OPERATORI DI APR
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/news/concluso-il-2-modulo-addestrativo-per-operatori-di-apr/
24.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it L’ A.M. PARTECIPA AL MEETING SUGLI OVNI
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/en/news/l-a-m-partecipa-al-meeting-sugli-ovni/
25.
Source: ventusky.com
Link:https://www.ventusky.com/it/guglionesi
26.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it OVN I
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/en/ovni/
27.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it Ufficio relazioni con il pubblico
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/en/ufficio-relazioni-con-il-pubblico/
28.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it Ufficio relazioni con il pubblico
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/ufficio-relazioni-con-il-pubblico/
29.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it Ami Cert
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/amicert/
30.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it Lo SMA
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/home/noi-siamo-l-am/organizzazione/lo-sma/
31.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it Meccanismo di Feedback
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/meccanismo-di-feedback/
32.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it OVN I Archives
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/category/ovni/
33.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it OVN I Archives
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/en/category/ovni/
Additional References
34.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9I84_R4L4A
Source snippet
Vatican Linked To First UFO Crash? Pentagon Whistleblower Shocks World | WION Podcast...
35.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Fascist UFOs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojvSWFiJiec
Source snippet
Strange lights. Unexplained encounters. Shocking truths | TOP 20 UFO ENCOUNTERS IN EUROPE...
36.
Source: youtube.com
Title: CLEAREST UFO Footage EVER FILMED? Inside The Italian Alien Stalker Case
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJADBG-qsbw
Source snippet
UFO Sightings Terrify Italy | The Proof Is Out There | History...
37.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO Sightings Terrify Italy | The Proof Is Out There | History
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybDQGcZjJWI
Source snippet
Fascist UFOs - Italian Mass Sightings | Full Documentary...
38.
Source: isnews.it
Link:https://www.isnews.it/2017/02/28/amianto-olio-e-solventi-abbandonati-nella-discarica-abusiva-sequestrata-dalla-finanza/
39.
Source: meteoblue.com
Link:https://www.meteoblue.com/it/tempo/historyclimate/weatherarchive/guglionesi_italia_3175680
40.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/415869481950473/posts/3205108379693222/
41.
Source: secretsdeclassified.af.mil
Link:https://www.secretsdeclassified.af.mil/Historical-Documents/Unidentified-Flying-Objects/
42.
Source: meteoweb.eu
Link:https://www.meteoweb.eu/2017/05/avvistata-una-strana-luce-in-cielo-in-provincia-di-savona-si-tratta-di-un-ufo-video/908790/
43.
Source: ilgiornaledelmolise.it
Link:https://www.ilgiornaledelmolise.it/2017/01/08/in-basso-molise-ancora-disagi-per-la-neve-a-guglionesi-famiglie-senza-luce-da-72-ore/