Within Liguria UFOs
How Italy Officially Handles UFO Reports
Italy's Air Force began formally collecting UFO reports after the 1978 wave, focusing on flight safety rather than extraterrestrial claims.
On this page
- Why the Air Force received responsibility
- How reports move through the Carabinieri
- What an unidentified classification means
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Italy’s modern official system for handling UFO reports grew out of the exceptional wave of sightings recorded in 1978. Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti assigned the Italian Air Force responsibility for collecting, checking and monitoring reports, not to investigate extraterrestrial life but to identify possible hazards to aviation and national security. Today, members of the public submit a detailed form through their nearest Carabinieri station; the Air Force can then compare the account with air traffic, radar, defence and meteorological information.[Aeronautica Militare]aeronautica.difesa.itAeronautica Militare OVNIAeronautica MilitareOVNI - Aeronautica Militare…

For Liguria, this system matters because the region’s best-known episode—the Pier Fortunato Zanfretta affair near Torriglia—began during the same national wave. The official archive also contains less famous Ligurian reports from the Genoa hinterland. Those records demonstrate that sightings entered a real government process, but an official classification as an unidentified flying object means only that investigators could not establish a secure technical or natural explanation. It does not confirm an unusual craft, still less an extraterrestrial one.
Why the Air Force received responsibility
Italian military authorities had recorded aerial anomalies before 1978. The Air Force’s published archive reaches back to 1972, and later reporting based on that archive counted 69 entries for 1978, the highest annual total in the historical series available at the time. The important change after the wave was therefore not the sudden discovery of UFOs, but the clearer designation of one institution to receive, verify and retain the reports.[RaiNews]rainews.itDal 1972, 445 avvistamenti di Ufo in Italia29 Mar 2014 — Sono stati 445 gli avvistamenti di Ufo registrati dall'Aeronautica milita…
The choice of the Air Force followed the practical nature of the problem. An unexplained light near an airway, military installation or airport may be relevant whether it proves to be an aircraft, balloon, meteor, atmospheric effect, unreported activity or something that remains unidentified. The Air Force states that the purpose of its work is flight safety and national security. A former head of the responsible department also stressed that deciding whether intelligent extraterrestrial life exists is outside the institution’s remit.[Aeronautica Militare]aeronautica.difesa.itAeronautica Militare OVNIAeronautica MilitareOVNI - Aeronautica Militare…
This distinction is easy to lose in popular accounts. “The military investigated” can sound as though officials suspected alien visitors. In practice, the policy treats a UFO report as an uncertain observation within controlled airspace. The first questions are operational: Was authorised traffic present? Did radar register anything? Were weather conditions capable of producing the appearance? Could the event represent a danger or an unauthorised flight?
The present responsibility lies with the General Security Department of the Air Staff. Its role is to coordinate the assessment rather than to operate as a field team devoted exclusively to UFOs. According to the Air Force, other competent bodies may be involved when a report requires specialist checks.[Aeronautica Militare]aeronautica.difesa.itAeronautica Militare OVNIAeronautica MilitareOVNI - Aeronautica Militare…
How reports move through the Carabinieri
A civilian does not normally send a short story or social-media video directly into the official archive. The Air Force provides a five-page reporting form, which must be completed as fully as the witness can manage and delivered to a local Carabinieri station. Photographs, recordings and other supporting material may be attached. The station forwards the documentation to the Air Staff’s General Security Department.[Aeronautica Militare]aeronautica.difesa.itAeronautica Militare
The involvement of the Carabinieri gives the report a formal point of entry. It identifies the witness, fixes the account in writing and allows locally available information to be added. An Air Force official explained that the station may supplement the witness’s statement with relevant details gathered within its area of responsibility. That is more useful than an anonymous online submission, although it does not by itself make the observation accurate.[MEDIA INAF]media.inaf.itMEDIA INAFMassimo Berti, il generale degli UFO – MEDIA INAFMEDIA INAFMassimo Berti, il generale degli UFO – MEDIA INAF
The form is designed to turn a visual impression into information that can be checked. It asks for:
- the exact date, local time and duration;
- weather, cloud, wind, visibility and the appearance of the Moon and stars;
- the observer’s position and whether they were travelling in a vehicle or aircraft;
- the object’s starting and finishing positions, apparent altitude and direction of movement;
- brightness, colour, shape, size, sound and changes during the observation;
- sketches of the landscape and apparent flight path;
- camera details, photographs or film;
- the names or number of other witnesses.[Aeronautica Militare]aeronautica.difesa.itAeronautica MilitareAeronautica Militare
These questions address the main weaknesses of ordinary UFO testimony. A witness may describe something as “low”, “large” or “fast” without knowing its distance. A light seen through mist can appear diffuse or close; a bright astronomical object can seem to move when viewed from a vehicle; an aircraft approaching head-on may appear stationary before changing direction abruptly. Recording location, horizon angle, weather and movement gives investigators at least some chance of testing such possibilities.
After the report reaches the Air Staff, checks may involve civil air-traffic information, air-defence organisations, meteorological data and radar records. The purpose is to find a correlation between the reported time and position and a known activity or natural event. The Air Force has said that its work concentrates on technical information that can be objectively checked; it does not normally conduct speculative interviews about alien origins or build theories around witness narratives.[Aeronautica Militare]aeronautica.difesa.itAeronautica Militare OVNIAeronautica MilitareOVNI - Aeronautica Militare…
The process has limitations. Radar coverage is not uniform, particularly for small, low or distant targets. A delayed report may arrive after useful operational records have become difficult to retrieve. Witness estimates may be too vague to compare reliably with flight paths. Photographs often lack scale, original metadata or a fixed reference point. An investigation can therefore end without identification because the evidence is insufficient, not because the object displayed extraordinary performance.
What an unidentified classification means
The Air Force’s definition is procedural. When investigators cannot connect a report with a technical activity or natural phenomenon, the episode is classified as an unidentified flying object. The term describes the outcome of the available checks: the cause was not established.[Aeronautica Militare]aeronautica.difesa.itAeronautica Militare OVNIAeronautica MilitareOVNI - Aeronautica Militare…
This produces an important apparent paradox. A case may be officially “unidentified” even when the underlying report is weak. Some historical archive entries contain precise times, directions and witness categories; others contain several fields marked as unknown or not stated. Yet many conclude with standard wording indicating that, after examination of the information held in the archive, the event was catalogued as an unidentified flying object.[Aeronautica Militare]aeronautica.difesa.itAeronautica Militare
An unidentified classification therefore does not necessarily mean:
- radar confirmed an object;
- military observers witnessed it;
- its speed or manoeuvres exceeded known technology;
- ordinary explanations were comprehensively eliminated;
- the Air Force judged it to be extraterrestrial.
It means that no explanation was established to the standard possible from the material available. The difference resembles an unsolved identification problem rather than a positive finding about the object’s nature.
Air Force officials have acknowledged that relatively few reports have been linked with certainty to known flight activity or meteorological phenomena, while many remain unidentified. That ratio should be interpreted carefully. A high unresolved percentage can reflect limited data and the narrow requirement for a confident match. The department itself has said that its analyses have not revealed a common origin for the reports and that many cases showed no evidence of a threat.[MEDIA INAF]media.inaf.itMEDIA INAFMassimo Berti, il generale degli UFO – MEDIA INAFMEDIA INAFMassimo Berti, il generale degli UFO – MEDIA INAF
What the archive shows about Liguria
Published statistics reported in 2014 placed Liguria at 17 Air Force entries between 1972 and 2013. This was well below Lazio and Tuscany but enough to show that the Zanfretta story was not the region’s only case reaching the national archive. These figures measure reports accepted into the official record, not the true frequency of unexplained phenomena and not the number of verified objects. Reporting habits, population, media attention and awareness of the procedure all influence the totals.[RaiNews]rainews.itDal 1972, 445 avvistamenti di Ufo in Italia29 Mar 2014 — Sono stati 445 gli avvistamenti di Ufo registrati dall'Aeronautica milita…
The 1978 archive includes reports from the Genoa hinterland during the closing days of the national wave. One entry records a white light moving slowly from north to south at Trino di Cicagna on 25 December. Another describes an oval luminous source reported at Scoffera di Torriglia on 27 December in cloud, rain and fog. Both were ultimately catalogued as unidentified.[Aeronautica Militare]aeronautica.difesa.itAeronautica Militare
These records are relevant to the atmosphere surrounding the Zanfretta affair, but they do not independently verify his alleged encounter. The Scoffera report occurred near Torriglia and within the same broad period, yet the published summary identifies only a luminous oval reported by a private citizen. It contains no confirmation of beings, an abduction, physical traces or an extraordinary craft. Similar dates and geography establish a local cluster of reports, not a shared cause.
The archive also lists later Ligurian observations. A luminous trace was reported over Genoa on 17 August 1988, followed by a triangular yellow light near Torriglia on 17 September. Two spherical, variably coloured lights were recorded over Genoa on consecutive nights in March 1996. The summaries again end with an unidentified classification, but provide no indication of strong radar confirmation or recovered physical evidence.[Aeronautica Militare]aeronautica.difesa.itAeronautica Militare
This is the most useful way to read Liguria’s official record: as a collection of standardised but uneven observations. It preserves dates, places, weather descriptions and witness categories that might otherwise have survived only in newspaper cuttings or UFO literature. At the same time, its brief summaries rarely contain enough material for outsiders to reconstruct every check or decide whether a probable explanation was missed.
Official reporting and the Zanfretta case
The Zanfretta case illustrates both the value and the boundary of the official system. Carabinieri involvement shows that unusual events reported by citizens or security personnel could generate formal statements and administrative records. That is historically important, particularly when separating contemporary documentation from details added years later.
However, the national Air Force process was designed mainly to evaluate aerial observations. It was not structured to validate claims recovered under hypnosis, judge alleged alien communications or investigate an extended abduction narrative. The questions on its form concern observable conditions: where the object appeared, how it moved, how bright it was, what the weather was like and whether instruments or other witnesses could corroborate it.[Aeronautica Militare]aeronautica.difesa.itAeronautica Militare
For that reason, an official light report near Torriglia and a police file connected with Zanfretta should not be treated as equivalent to government confirmation of his full account. Different documents may record different propositions. One may establish that a distressed witness made a statement; another that residents reported lights; another that no matching aircraft or natural event was found. None automatically proves the more dramatic interpretation later attached to the case.
The system nevertheless changed the historical position of Ligurian sightings. Reports made through the proper channel could become part of a national archive rather than remaining wholly dependent on local newspapers or private investigators. That makes the official material valuable for chronology and comparison, even where it cannot resolve the underlying event.
A useful record, not a verdict on alien visitation
Italy’s post-1978 arrangements are best understood as an air-safety and security reporting mechanism. They provide a route from citizen witness to Carabinieri station, from formal questionnaire to Air Force review, and from technical checks to a published classification. The process is more disciplined than informal UFO reporting because it seeks precise times, locations, weather details and possible radar or aviation correlations.[Aeronautica Militare]aeronautica.difesa.itAeronautica Militare OVNIAeronautica MilitareOVNI - Aeronautica Militare…
Its evidential value should still be kept in proportion. The archive confirms that reports were received and assessed; it does not guarantee that the reported object existed exactly as described. “Unidentified” is a statement about the limits of the investigation, not a hidden synonym for alien spacecraft.
For Liguria, that distinction is particularly important. The official record supports the conclusion that the 1978 wave included several reports in and around the Genoa hinterland and that later sightings continued to enter the national system. It strengthens the documentary history of the regional phenomenon. It does not, by itself, strengthen the extraordinary claims attached to Zanfretta or turn Liguria’s unresolved lights into evidence of extraterrestrial visitation.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to How Italy Officially Handles UFO Reports. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience
Cited by the New York Review of Books as “the best brief for visitation,” this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Re...
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • Impeccably researched, this riveting journalistic investigation separates fact from fiction, and documents th...
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects is a book by Edward J. Ruppelt which described the study of UFOs by United States Air Force fro...
In Plain Sight
An award-winning journalist investigates a story largely ignored by mainstream media but right there, in front of our eyes ... Are we not...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromufo poster oneBay.co.uk.
Current eBay listing
VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT
Current eBay listing
I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print
Endnotes
1.
Source: media.inaf.it
Title: MEDIA INAFMassimo Berti, il generale degli UFO – MEDIA INAF
Link:https://www.media.inaf.it/2015/09/14/massimo-berti-intervista/
2.
Source: rainews.it
Link:https://www.rainews.it/archivio-rainews/articoli/ufo-avvistamenti-segnalazioni-italia-aeronautica-218a7f1a-d128-4494-b464-066f409c5400.html
Source snippet
Dal 1972, 445 avvistamenti di Ufo in Italia29 Mar 2014 — Sono stati 445 gli avvistamenti di Ufo registrati dall'Aeronautica milita...
3.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: Aeronautica Militare
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/ModuloUFO-1.pdf
4.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: Aeronautica Militare
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Archivio_OVNI_periodo1991-2000.pdf
5.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: Aeronautica Militare
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Archivio_OVNI_periodo1972-1990.pdf
6.
Source: rainews.it
Link:https://www.rainews.it/archivio-rainews/media/Avvistamenti-Ufo-negli-archivi-Aeronautica-Un-libro-svela-i-misteri-del-cielo-3728687e-71c0-4c2a-9d0e-6d47e6f7ac67.html
7.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: Aeronautica Militare OVNI
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/ovni/
Source snippet
Aeronautica MilitareOVNI - Aeronautica Militare...
8.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it OVN I
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/en/2023/01/12/ovni/
9.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/en/category/ovni/
10.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/en/ovni/
11.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it OVN I Archives
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/category/ovni/
12.
Source: aeronautica.difesa.it
Title: it Ufficio relazioni con il pubblico
Link:https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/ufficio-relazioni-con-il-pubblico/
13.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italy
14.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Pier Fortunato Zanfretta
Link:https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pier_Fortunato_Zanfretta
15.
Source: oggetti.com
Link:https://www.oggetti.com/pages/about
16.
Source: italia.it
Title: Discover Italy: Official Tourism Website
Link:https://www.italia.it/en
17.
Source: play.google.com
Link:https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?hl=en&id=it.mitur.italia
18.
Source: cntraveler.com
Link:https://www.cntraveler.com/destinations/italy
19.
Source: it.scribd.com
Link:https://it.scribd.com/document/490374032/Ufo
Additional References
20.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/oggetti__/
21.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO in Torriglia (2/13) Unidentified Flying Object Genova Italy
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFO7UR6zObM
Source snippet
This documentary breakdown of the 1978 Italian UFO wave is relevant because it explains the surge in sightings that prompted Prime Minist...
22.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/oggetti/
Source snippet
for inquiries”...
23.
Source: 70-80.it
Link:https://www.70-80.it/1978-il-progetto-blue-book-ispira-la-serie-tv-project-ufo-due-stagioni-di-13-episodi-cadauna-che-arriveranno-in-italia-negli-anni-80/
24.
Source: oggetti.com
Link:https://www.oggetti.com/
25.
Source: x.com
Link:https://x.com/Italia?lang=en
26.
Source: oggetti.com
Link:https://www.oggetti.com/collections/lighting
27.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/oggettidesigns/?hl=en-gb
28.
Source: petitesondes.net
Link:https://www.petitesondes.net/Epoca/UFO/1978-1444-Ufo.pdf
29.
Source: anai.org
Link:https://www.anai.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ANAI_Archivi_1-2014.pdf