Why Lamezia's UFO Videos Remain Inconclusive

Introduction

Lamezia Terme’s best-known modern UFO cluster consists of three visual reports publicised together in June 2015 by the private Centro Ufologico Mediterraneo, or C.UFO.M. The incidents were said to have occurred on 4 May 2014, 3 August 2014 and 4 or 5 April 2015. Witnesses described bright spheres, a darker central object and a rapidly departing orange light; photographs and promotional video material helped the story spread beyond Calabria.[lametino.it]lametino.itil Lametino.it Lamezia: Centro Ufologico Mediterraneo rende noti avvistamentiil Lametino.itLamezia: Centro Ufologico Mediterraneo rende noti avvistamenti - il Lametino.it…

The images did not, however, provide the measurements needed to identify what was in the sky. No publicly available record supplies a securely established distance, physical size, flight path, original-file examination, radar confirmation or simultaneous view from a second location. The cluster therefore remains inconclusive in the strict sense: it records several sincere-looking reports that were not identified, but it does not demonstrate extraordinary aircraft or performance.

The three reported cases from 2014 and 2015

The cases gained much of their apparent strength from being presented as a connected sequence rather than as three isolated observations. Two witnesses reportedly took part in both the May 2014 and April 2015 events, while the first incident was said to have been seen by roughly ten people. C.UFO.M. treated these repetitions as evidence that the Lamezia area deserved closer attention. Local and national websites largely reproduced the organisation’s account, often with dramatic descriptions but little additional independent investigation.[lametino.it]lametino.itil Lametino.it Lamezia: Centro Ufologico Mediterraneo rende noti avvistamentiil Lametino.itLamezia: Centro Ufologico Mediterraneo rende noti avvistamenti - il Lametino.it…

4 May 2014: three objects in apparent formation

The most detailed report concerned an observation on the outskirts of Lamezia Terme on 4 May 2014. About ten witnesses were said to have seen three objects: two bright, pale globes and a darker or partly metallic-looking object between them. The arrangement was interpreted as a formation, with the central object sometimes described as disc-shaped and apparently “escorted” by the lights on either side.[lametino.it]lametino.itil Lametino.it Lamezia: Centro Ufologico Mediterraneo rende noti avvistamentiil Lametino.itLamezia: Centro Ufologico Mediterraneo rende noti avvistamenti - il Lametino.it…

Accounts stated that the objects remained visible for several minutes, sometimes appeared stationary, then moved towards or into clouds at what witnesses perceived as very high speed. One published summary placed them at a relatively low altitude, around 500 metres, but the available articles do not explain how that figure was calculated. Without triangulation, radar data or a known object at the same distance, such an altitude is an estimate rather than a measurement.[il Lametino.it]lametino.itil Lametino.it Lamezia: Centro Ufologico Mediterraneo rende noti avvistamentiil Lametino.itLamezia: Centro Ufologico Mediterraneo rende noti avvistamenti - il Lametino.it…

This distinction affects every further claim. A small nearby object and a large distant object can occupy the same apparent width in a photograph. The impression that three points form a coordinated group can also arise when unrelated objects happen to lie along similar sight lines. Multiple witnesses improve confidence that something was visible, but they do not by themselves establish its range, size or nature.

3 August 2014: an orange light and one photograph

The second incident reportedly occurred at about 1 a.m. on 3 August 2014. Two colleagues returning from work saw what one witness described as an orange sphere. They stopped and attempted to photograph it with a mobile phone, but obtained only one image before the light appeared to rise vertically and disappear. When the photograph was reviewed, the recorded shape was said to look curved rather than spherical. C.UFO.M. compared it with a boomerang form while acknowledging that further investigation was required.[Quicosenza]quicosenza.itAvvistati Ufo a Lamezia Terme, rese pubbliche le analisi svolte dal centro ufologico (TESTIMONIANZE, FOTO E VIDEO) – quicosenza…

That difference between the object as remembered and the object as photographed is not automatically evidence of transformation or concealed structure. It is precisely the sort of discrepancy that can result when a small bright source is recorded at night by a handheld camera. Movement during exposure, loss of focus, optical flare and electronic processing can stretch or bend a point of light. With only one frame, there is no sequence showing whether the curved form persisted or changed with camera movement.

The report also illustrates the weakness of judging speed from disappearance alone. A light may vanish because it is obscured, switched off, turned away, entered cloud, became too faint or left the narrow field of view. A witness’s impression of rapid upward departure is important testimony, but a single still image cannot independently test that motion.

April 2015: two bright spheres above central Lamezia

The final report involved a father and son travelling to school in central Lamezia. They saw and photographed two bright white objects moving horizontally at what they considered considerable altitude. Reports said an aircraft was also visible and appeared lower than the objects, encouraging the inference that the lights were both high and physically large.[lametino.it]lametino.itil Lametino.it Lamezia: Centro Ufologico Mediterraneo rende noti avvistamentiil Lametino.itLamezia: Centro Ufologico Mediterraneo rende noti avvistamenti - il Lametino.it…

The exact date is inconsistent across the surviving coverage. Most reports give Sunday, 5 April 2015, while another detailed article places the event at about 8.20 a.m. on 4 April. This may be a simple publication or transcription error, but it matters because precise timing is needed to compare a sighting with aircraft movements, weather observations, astronomical objects and balloon releases.[lametino.it]lametino.itil Lametino.it Lamezia: Centro Ufologico Mediterraneo rende noti avvistamentiil Lametino.itLamezia: Centro Ufologico Mediterraneo rende noti avvistamenti - il Lametino.it…

The aircraft comparison is also less decisive than it sounds. Objects that overlap in a two-dimensional image need not be close to one another. An aeroplane can appear below a light while being much farther away, much nearer, or travelling on an entirely different course. Without a measured viewing direction, identified flight and synchronised images, the photograph cannot establish that the spheres were above the aircraft or determine their size.

Some coverage argued against balloons because the lights appeared to maintain altitude and move horizontally while little or no wind was noticed at ground level. Yet surface wind does not reliably describe wind at higher altitudes, and the reports provide no balloon trajectory, upper-air data or timed positional measurements. Balloons are therefore neither proven nor rigorously excluded by the published material.[Quicosenza]quicosenza.itAvvistati Ufo a Lamezia Terme, rese pubbliche le analisi svolte dal centro ufologico (TESTIMONIANZE, FOTO E VIDEO) – quicosenza…

Why the images cannot settle the identification

The central problem is not necessarily that the witnesses were unreliable or that the photographs were fabricated. It is that images of small, distant lights contain far less physical information than they appear to contain.

Zoom enlarges pixels, not evidence

When a distant object occupies only a few pixels, enlarging the image makes the feature easier to see but does not recover missing detail. Edges produced by compression, sharpening or interpolation can begin to resemble discs, crescents, diamonds or boomerangs. A magnified blur may look structured even when the original sensor recorded little more than an overexposed point.

Forensic imaging guidance warns that lossy compression can remove critical information and introduce unwanted artefacts, with repeated saving causing further degradation. This is particularly relevant to UFO images circulated through news sites, social networks or edited video trailers, where the displayed copy may be resized and recompressed rather than preserved as the original camera file.[FBI Archives]archives.fbi.govFBI ArchivesFBI — Definitions and Guidelines for the Use of Imaging Technologies in the Criminal Justice System, by SWGIT (Forensic Scien…

The published Lamezia coverage does not clearly document whether outside specialists received untouched originals from every device, preserved a chain of custody or released full-resolution files with their complete metadata. That does not show that the pictures were altered. It means readers cannot independently establish how much processing occurred between capture and publication.

Focus changes the apparent shape of lights

A camera focuses by adjusting its optics for a particular distance. Against a largely featureless sky, especially at night, automatic focus may lock onto the wrong distance or continue searching. A bright object that is out of focus can become a soft circular patch, a ring, a polygon based on the aperture or an irregular shape affected by lens imperfections.

Overexposure adds another difficulty. When a bright point exceeds the sensor’s recording range, its centre becomes featureless and can spread into neighbouring pixels. Camera software may then apply noise reduction, contrast enhancement and edge sharpening. The final shape can reveal more about the optical and processing system than about the source itself.

This makes the August photograph’s curved appearance especially uncertain. A boomerang-like blur is not a reliable measurement of a boomerang-shaped object unless the form remains stable across several sharply focused frames, changes consistently with viewpoint and can be separated from camera motion and lens artefacts.

Low light turns movement into extraordinary speed

At night or in weak light, cameras commonly use longer exposure times or higher electronic sensitivity. A moving light—or a stationary light recorded by a moving hand—can leave a streak. Even slight rotation of the phone during an exposure may produce a curved trail. A witness may experience the movement as sudden, while the photograph combines a fraction of a second of camera and object motion into one unfamiliar form.

Video introduces similar complications. Digital stabilisation, autofocus changes, rolling-shutter distortion, compression and attempts to keep a small object centred can all alter the apparent movement. An object may seem to accelerate because the camera zooms, pans or loses its reference background.

Modern official UAP analysis repeatedly encounters these limitations. The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office has published cases in which apparently unusual motion was reduced after reconstructing viewing geometry, matching flight data or identifying compression artefacts. It has also retained other videos as unresolved simply because the footage was insufficient—not because anomalous performance was demonstrated.[AARO]aaro.milUAP ImageryAARO UAP Imagery…

Distance is the missing variable

Claims about high speed, large size or low altitude all require distance. A photograph normally provides angular size: how large an object appears within the frame. Physical size can be calculated only when its range is known or can be constrained through geometry.

The same applies to velocity. A light crossing ten degrees of sky in two seconds might be a nearby insect moving modestly, a balloon or bird at intermediate distance, or a distant aircraft travelling quickly. Without range, converting apparent angular motion into kilometres per hour is impossible.

Official technical guidance on UAP observations stresses that forced perspective and parallax can distort estimates of size, speed and direction. It recommends combining observer accounts with additional sensor data rather than treating a single viewpoint as a complete physical record.[AARO]aaro.milEffect of Forced Perspective and Parallax View on UAP ObservationsEffect of Forced Perspective and Parallax View on UAP Observations…

What the investigation established—and what it did not

C.UFO.M. interviewed witnesses, assembled photographs and publicised the three reports as cases worthy of attention. The organisation appears to have treated witness sincerity and repetition as important indicators, particularly because two people reportedly saw similar bright objects in both 2014 and 2015. Contemporary articles described its conclusions as provisional and said that further findings would be released if available.[quicosenza.it]quicosenza.itAvvistati Ufo a Lamezia Terme, rese pubbliche le analisi svolte dal centro ufologico (TESTIMONIANZE, FOTO E VIDEO) – quicosenza…

The public reporting nevertheless makes it difficult to separate primary evidence from interpretation. Statements that the central object was metallic, the lights were at about 500 metres, the April objects were above an aircraft or the group departed at extraordinary speed are not accompanied by published calculations showing how those conclusions were reached.

Nor is there a clearly documented independent institutional investigation. The available accounts do not identify an Italian Air Force case file, air-traffic-control record, police report, meteorological reconstruction or radar return corresponding to the cluster. No publicly cited second organisation appears to have reproduced the image analysis from the original material.

Later publicity did not materially close these gaps. C.UFO.M. continued to refer to the Lamezia case and promoted television and online coverage, but repetition in media is not new evidence. One later page even described the principal event as occurring on 4 May 2015 rather than 2014, illustrating how details can drift when a case is retold. The earlier contemporary reports consistently place the three-object observation in May 2014.[centroufologicomediterraneo.it]centroufologicomediterraneo.itUFO IN DIRETTA. MONTAURO (CATANZARO). USO EMERGE DAL MARE VELOCISSIMO, SI FERMA E SPARISCE! - C.UFO.M…

The video label also requires care. Contemporary pages mention photographs, images and a widely viewed video trailer. The accessible reporting does not clearly establish that every event was captured in continuous, original video showing the claimed movement from beginning to end. An edited presentation of stills, testimony and graphics has much less analytical value than uncut footage with timestamps, a stable horizon and known camera settings.[lametino.it]lametino.itil Lametino.it Lamezia: Centro Ufologico Mediterraneo rende noti avvistamentiil Lametino.itLamezia: Centro Ufologico Mediterraneo rende noti avvistamenti - il Lametino.it…

What independent checks would have strengthened the cases

A stronger investigation would have begun by preserving the original files directly from the recording devices. Investigators could then have documented file hashes, camera models, focal lengths, exposure times, focus settings, timestamps and any editing history. Metadata is not infallible—it can be absent or altered—but it can help establish provenance and processing when considered alongside witness testimony and image structure.[FBI Archives]archives.fbi.govArchives FBI — Standards and GuidelinesArchives FBI — Standards and Guidelines

The most useful checks would have included:

These requirements may sound demanding, but they reflect the difference between recording an unidentified light and measuring an anomalous vehicle. NASA’s independent UAP study found that the shortage of high-quality observations prevents firm scientific conclusions and emphasised calibrated data, multiple measurements and thorough sensor metadata.[NASA]nasa.govUPDATE: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report; Names DirectorUPDATE: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report; Names Director

The cluster’s place in Calabria’s UFO history

The Lamezia reports matter less as a landmark encounter than as a clear example of how a regional cluster forms. Several observations occurred within roughly a year; some witnesses overlapped; photographs gave the reports a tangible visual element; and a private UFO organisation brought them together under one narrative. News websites then repeated that narrative, often using the same descriptions and conclusions.

That process can make a group of cases appear mutually reinforcing. Yet similarity between bright spheres is weak evidence of a common source because distant aircraft, balloons, celestial objects and camera artefacts frequently appear as simple points or globes. The repetition may represent a real local pattern, increased attention after the first sighting, ordinary objects interpreted through the earlier experience, or some combination of these.

Within Calabria’s much larger UFO archive, the Lamezia cluster is therefore best classified as visually documented but evidentially limited. Calabria’s catalogue contains more than a thousand reports assessed for source, reliability and apparent strangeness, but inclusion in such an archive records that an observation was reported; it does not establish an exotic explanation.[CISU]cisu.orgUFO in Calabria: il catalogo dei casiUFO in Calabria: il catalogo dei casi

The fairest conclusion is not that the three events were debunked, because no single conventional identification has been demonstrated for every image. It is also not that the photographs confirm structured, high-performance craft. The surviving material is too compressed, too weakly measured and too dependent on witness estimates to decide between distant mundane objects, photographic distortion and a genuinely unusual aerial source.

Lamezia Terme’s cluster remains unidentified principally because essential data were never publicly supplied. Its lasting value is methodological: it shows why photographs and videos can attract attention while still failing to answer the basic questions of distance, scale, trajectory and independent confirmation.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Why Lamezia's UFO Videos Remain Inconclusive. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry

By Joseph Allen Hynek

Cited by the New York Review of Books as "the best brief for visitation," this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...

See on Amazon

Book

Bad Astronomy

By Philip C. Plait

A clever, thought-provoking guide that attacks common astronomical misconceptions What is Bad Astronomy? Anything that accidentally or in...

See on Amazon

Book

The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark

By Carl Sagan

NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • From the renowned astronomer and author of Cosmos comes a “powerful [and] stirring defense of informed ration...

See on Amazon

Book

Understanding Exposure

By Bryan F. Peterson

Rating: 4.5/5 from 19 Google Books ratings

Provides detailed lessons on the elements of exposure and how each relates to depth of field, freezing and blurring action, and shooting...

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon:The UFO Experience: A Scientific InquiryBad AstronomyThe Demon Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

Shop location

UsingUSA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Current eBay listing

UFO Over Desert Highway Sci-Fi Abduction Poster Print Framed Canvas Wall Art

GBP 14.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: paradiseposters (99.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print

GBP 21.95 | Free shippingNewSeller: mintprint77 (100.0% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT

GBP 10.76 | Free shippingNewSeller: andys-prints-uk (99.7% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

Conspiracy Theory Poster Wall Print Gift UFO Aliens Flat Earth Moon Landing

GBP 18.97 | Free shippingNewSeller: forgevalleyprint (98.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: lametino.it
Title: il Lametino.it Lamezia: Centro Ufologico Mediterraneo rende noti avvistamenti
Link:https://www.lametino.it/ultimora/lamezia-centro-ufologico-mediterraneo-rende-noti-avvistamenti.html

2. Source: meteoweb.eu
Title: Meteo Web Doppio avvistamento UFO a Lamezia Terme (CZ) [FOTO e VIDEO]
Link:https://www.meteoweb.eu/2015/06/doppio-avvistamento-ufo-a-lamezia-terme-cz-foto-e-video/455353/

3. Source: quicosenza.it
Link:https://quicosenza.it/news/41560-avvistati-ufo-a-lamezia-terme-rese-pubbliche-le-analisi-svolte-dal-centro-ufologico-testimonianze-foto-e-video/

4. Source: affaritaliani.it
Title: Ufo a Lamezia Terme, le foto dell’avvistamento choc
Link:https://www.affaritaliani.it/cronache/ufo-a-lamezia-terme-le-foto-avvistamento-choc-370149.html

5. Source: archives.fbi.gov
Link:https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/about-us/lab/forensic-science-communications/fsc/july2001/swgit.htm

6. Source: aaro.mil
Title: UAP Imagery
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/

7. Source: aaro.mil
Title: Effect of Forced Perspective and Parallax View on UAP Observations
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/Information%20Papers/AARO_Effect_of_Forced_Perspective_and_Parallax_View_on_UAP_Observations_2024.pdf?ver=WTwJtQaCvC3BkRlBJCGLzg%3D%3D

8. Source: centroufologicomediterraneo.it
Link:https://www.centroufologicomediterraneo.it/wp/ufo-diretta-montauro-catanzaro-uso-emerge-dal-mare-velocissimo-si-ferma-e-sparisce/

9. Source: archives.fbi.gov
Title: Archives FBI — Standards and Guidelines
Link:https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/about-us/lab/forensic-science-communications/fsc/april2008/standards/2008_04_standards02.htm

10. Source: nasa.gov
Title: UPDATE: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report; Names Director
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/update-nasa-shares-uap-independent-study-report-names-director/

11. Source: cisu.org
Title: UFO in Calabria: il catalogo dei casi
Link:https://www.cisu.org/ufo-in-calabria-il-catalogo-dei-casi/

12. Source: science.gsfc.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.gsfc.nasa.gov/stella/instruments/spectral/

13. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-Imagery-Acc-Table/

14. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-UAP-Report-Documents/poster/dividLink/

15. Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/

16. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/

17. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006159/dvpmoduleid/77396/

18. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1014097/dvpcc/false/

19. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20230015735

20. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20220018236

21. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20220008204

22. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006094/dvpcc/false/

23. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006093/dvpcc/false/

24. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20190028665.pdf

25. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20170011048.pdf

26. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20120014236

27. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20060010387

28. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880003483

29. Source: archives.fbi.gov
Link:https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/about-us/lab/forensic-science-communications/fsc/jan2003/swgitdigital.htm

30. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Inactive-Parent/Next-UAP-Imagery-dup/

31. Source: aaro.mil
Title: AAR O UAP Trends UAP REPORTING TRENDS
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/UAP-Reporting-Trends/

32. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-Trends/

33. Source: aaro.mil
Title: UAP Records
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Records/

34. Source: cisu.org
Title: Pietro Torre
Link:https://www.cisu.org/pietro-torre/

35. Source: cisu.org
Title: Pietro Torre Archivi
Link:https://www.cisu.org/tag/pietro-torre/

36. Source: cisu.org
Link:https://www.cisu.org/author/grassino/

37. Source: cisu.org
Title: ufo a messina
Link:https://www.cisu.org/tag/ufo-a-messina/

38. Source: cisu.org
Title: 10 anni di ufo museum
Link:https://www.cisu.org/10-anni-di-ufo-museum/

39. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19660009122

40. Source: Wikipedia
Title: Lamezia Terme
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamezia_Terme

Additional References

41. Source: youtube.com
Title: CALABRIA DOMENICA SERA OGGETTI LUMINOSI IN CIELO NON SONO UFO 24 GIU
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgS8rNmbwxM

42. Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO Sightings Terrify Italy | The Proof Is Out There | History
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybDQGcZjJWI

43. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGIN4R6kd1k

44. Source: youtube.com
Title: Bivongi: Testimonianze di presunti e strani avvistamenti Ufo
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uK9GQmdkUw

45. Source: lagazzettadelmezzogiorno.it
Link:https://www.lagazzettadelmezzogiorno.it/news/italia/200408/avvistato-ufo-in-cieli-calabria.html

46. Source: fujifilm.com
Link:https://www.fujifilm.com/ca/en/consumer/support/digital-cameras-faqs

47. Source: stanstedairport.com
Link:https://www.stanstedairport.com/destinations-and-guides/lamezia/

48. Source: mapy.com
Link:https://mapy.com/en/?id=55049&source=osm

49. Source: airbnb.co.uk
Link:https://www.airbnb.co.uk/lamezia-terme-italy/stays

50. Source: terzobinario.it
Link:https://www.terzobinario.it/avvistamenti-ufo-a-lamezia-terme-disco-volante-scuro-e-sfere-chiare/